Re: [marxmail] Marx, degrowth, and productivism

> On Jun 14, 2024, at 11:59 AM, Charlie via groups.io > wrote: > > https://mltoday.com/global-warming-the-environmental-movement-and-socialism/ Charlie, I think this article sidesteps the issues raised in https://climateandcapitalism.com/2024/06/13/two-views-both-wrong-on-marx-degrowth-and-

Re: [marxmail] Marx, degrowth, and productivism

Mark noted: "It's time, I think, that we seriously consider the goals, strategy, tactics and demands..." On the goal: Humankind is on the threshold of passing from industrial civilization powered by burning hydrocarbons to a fundamentally new energy base that supports and is supported by a new

Re: [marxmail] Marx, degrowth, and productivism

Ian Angus wrote: Saito versus Huber and Phillips: Opposing views both promote the myth of > Marxist Prometheanism It's always pleasure to comment on an essay I almost entirely agree with! I posted similar criticisms to the EconoSpeak blog back in November, Growth below zero and the development o

Re: [marxmail] Marx, degrowth, and productivism

> On Jun 13, 2024, at 11:01 AM, Ian Angus via groups.io > wrote: > > TWO VIEWS (BOTH WRONG) ON MARX, DEGROWTH, AND PRODUCTIVISM > https://climateandcapitalism.com/2024/06/13/two-views-both-wrong-on-marx-degrowth-and-productivism/ I agree with the article and have had the benefit of MEP's Ec

[marxmail] Marx, degrowth, and productivism

TWO VIEWS (BOTH WRONG) ON MARX, DEGROWTH, AND PRODUCTIVISM Saito versus Huber and Phillips: Opposing views both promote the myth of Marxist Prometheanism Ian Angus Editor, Climate & Capitalism ht