Re: [Maria-discuss] TLS SNI support

2016-09-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.09.2016 um 21:08 schrieb Felipe Gasper: On 2 Sep 2016, at 1:59 PM, Reinis Rozitis wrote: Actually, that’s a big annoyance with Apache, that the configuration expects every virtual host to have the same SSL certificate. So if your vhost has 5 domains, you need a single certificate w

Re: [Maria-discuss] TLS SNI support

2016-09-02 Thread Felipe Gasper
> On 2 Sep 2016, at 1:59 PM, Reinis Rozitis wrote: > >> Actually, that’s a big annoyance with Apache, that the configuration expects >> every virtual host to have the same SSL certificate. So if your vhost has 5 >> domains, you need a single certificate with 5 domains. Bleh. > > Well you just

Re: [Maria-discuss] TLS SNI support

2016-09-02 Thread Reinis Rozitis
Actually, that’s a big annoyance with Apache, that the configuration expects every virtual host to have the same SSL certificate. So if your vhost has 5 domains, you need a single certificate with 5 domains. Bleh. Well you just make 5 vhosts with each having it’s own certificate definition but

Re: [Maria-discuss] TLS SNI support

2016-09-02 Thread Felipe Gasper
> On 2 Sep 2016, at 3:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> It’s a boon in shared hosting environments > > in webhosting environments the different hostnames have differnt document > roots aka websites aka as virtual servers > Actually, that’s a big annoyance with Apache, that the configuration e

Re: [Maria-discuss] TLS SNI support

2016-09-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 02.09.2016 um 06:51 schrieb Felipe Gasper: Has support for TLS SNI ever been discussed for MariaDB? to achieve what? This would allow hosting of multiple SSL certificates from the same server nobody is hosting ssl certificates It’s a boon in shared hosting environments in webhostin

[Maria-discuss] TLS SNI support

2016-09-01 Thread Felipe Gasper
Hi all, Has support for TLS SNI ever been discussed for MariaDB? This would allow hosting of multiple SSL certificates from the same server. It’s a boon in shared hosting environments. From the client’s end, at least, it would be trivial to implement. Doing it on the server wou