ia-discuss] PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA to be disabled in 10.0 (10.0.12)
Para: "Maria Discuss" ,
maria-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
Fecha: martes, 3 de junio, 2014 10:20
Hi all,
Recently there was chat about how PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA was
enabled by mistake and it should be disabled in the 10.0
Hi, Pavel!
On Jun 03, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
> I personally would prefer if MariaDB had performance schema not
> compiled in by default. Then we wouldn't be frustrated every time we
> upgrade and find out that the tarball doesn't compile without
> performance schema (yes, 10.0.11 doesn't compile).
T
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:20:25PM +0800, Colin Charles wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently there was chat about how PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA was enabled by mistake
> and it should be disabled in the 10.0 series. I'm curious - how many of you
> are using PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA? Is it a problem to turn it on, if
hum, maybe a "-debug" package and a "-production" package could be better
if someone what a developer version get the -debug, for production use
"-production"
is it easy to create two kinds of packages at mariadb release time?
2014-06-03 14:10 GMT-03:00 Pavel Ivanov :
> I personally would prefer
I personally would prefer if MariaDB had performance schema not
compiled in by default. Then we wouldn't be frustrated every time we
upgrade and find out that the tarball doesn't compile without
performance schema (yes, 10.0.11 doesn't compile).
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Colin Charles wrote
oh sorry, at development just performacnce-schema=1
and sometimes when i need more information i try two others plugins to
check query times and query cache informations (hit rate per query)
2014-06-03 14:00 GMT-03:00 Sergei Golubchik :
> Hi, Roberto!
>
> On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim wrote:
>> i only
i will check but i compile every production binary from source, i
think it's a compile time option not my.cnf file, i will check and
return
2014-06-03 14:00 GMT-03:00 Sergei Golubchik :
> Hi, Roberto!
>
> On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim wrote:
>> i only use it at development, at production it's not used
Hi, Roberto!
On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> i only use it at development, at production it's not used
And what performance-schema related options do you have in your
development my.cnf file? Is it only performance-schema=1 or something
more involved?
> >> Recently there was chat about how PE
Hi,
Never used it on production. From my point of view, it should be
disabled by default, but included.
The whole purpose of this variable is to have a way to analyze/optimize
performances easily, when needed; if it's enable by default, we have a
perf hit, so that's counterproductive.
I assu
i only use it at development, at production it's not used
2014-06-03 6:24 GMT-03:00 Jean Weisbuch :
> I personally never had time to give much looks to P_S, i gave it some
> looks but never seriously dug onto and really had to keep it enabled on a
> production server, its a nice feature but i th
I personally never had time to give much looks to P_S, i gave it some
looks but never seriously dug onto and really had to keep it enabled on
a production server, its a nice feature but i think that if someone
knows it and needs it, they will be able to enable it but most of the
"common" users
Hi all,
Recently there was chat about how PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA was enabled by mistake and
it should be disabled in the 10.0 series. I'm curious - how many of you are
using PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA? Is it a problem to turn it on, if you use it?
I'm referring to:
https://mariadb.atlassian.net/br
12 matches
Mail list logo
