Hello,
I'm currently working on migrating a Galera 10.3 cluster (A) to Amazon RDS.
(B)
In order to minimize impacts and downtime, the plan is to have a standard
MySQL Slave on RDS (B) to sync data, then do the switch to it and stop the
replication A->B.
The main concern is a catastrophic scenario
Thank you for noting that there is no kSnappyCompression Vladislab. Thank
you! After some research, I finally ended up with the following my.ini
file, in case you find it useful:
#
I will introduce the following configuration settings to my.ini
Configuration File in order to use Bloom Filters, and enable compression.
Any further suggestion? Thank you!
rocksdb_default_cf_options="block_based_table_factory={filter_policy=bloomfilter:10:false;};prefix_extractor=capped:4};leve
Dear MariaDB Developers,
I have an issue with RocksDB, as it takes a lot of Memory after
performing a Bulk Load, taking almost 30GB of RAM Memory after data
ingestion.
My question is: ¿How can I flush RocksDB Compactation MemTables after
the Data Bulk Load? ¿Is there any FLUSH TABLES ROCKSDB comm
Hello,
When upgrading from 10.1.16 to 10.1.17 on Debian Jessie i've received the
following error:
aptitude upgrade
dpkg: error processing package mariadb-server-10.1 (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-
ats on the KB page.
Some of these slides could be re-used for the documentation I think :
https://www.slideshare.net/mobile/SergeyPetrunya/mariadb-engine-independent-table-statistics-including-histograms
dE wrote
> Humm.. thanks for clarifying that!
>
> On 01/04/16 03:20, Ser
Humm.. thanks for clarifying that!
On 01/04/16 03:20, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, dE!
On Jan 02, dE wrote:
Hi!
I was playing around with indexes after we faced problems with
mariadb choosing the wrong index because of high average value group size.
So I created a table with 4 text
Hi!
Taking the example as provided in my last mail: I created a table
with 4 text columns and indexed the 4th column with a prefix length of 1.
To trigger high no. of index scans I used the following where clause --
f4 like 'klas9dufa9us09df8a8%'
Explain shows mariadb still chooses to us
Hi!
I was playing around with indexes after we faced problems with
mariadb choosing the wrong index because of high average value group size.
So I created a table with 4 text columns and indexed the 4th column with
a prefix length of 1.
Following are the stats in brief --
The index has
On 02/26/15 09:46, dE wrote:
Hi!
I've realized that by default MariaDB allow full access to a database
for anon. users.
$ mysql --user asdfasdf test
MariaDB [test]> insert into test (sr) values (1);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.12 sec)
I tried to revoke but --
Revoke all on test.t
Hi!
I've realized that by default MariaDB allow full access to a database
for anon. users.
$ mysql --user asdfasdf test
MariaDB [test]> insert into test (sr) values (1);
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.12 sec)
I tried to revoke but --
Revoke all on test.test from ''@'';
ERROR 1141 (42000): There
11 matches
Mail list logo
