On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Elena Stepanova
wrote:
> Yes, this is actually right.
> The repository contains latest versions of both MariaDB server and
> MariaDB-Galera.
> MariaDB server 5.5.35 has been released, but MariaDB-Galera hasn't yet (it
> will be soon).
So, it's intended for a Fedor
In the Fedora 20 Yum repository [1], I see the following:
MariaDB-Galera-5.5.34-fedora19-x86_64-server.rpm
That can't be right.
[1] http://yum.mariadb.org/5.5/fedora20-amd64/rpms/
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to : mar
Any word on when the corresponding Galera packages will be available?
I've heard that's when the Fedora 20 MariaDB+Galera RPMs will be
available.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsub
Any chance we can target socket activation for 10.1?
https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-5536
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
The documentation currently warns against using Galera with Fedora
[1]. Is that advice still true with Fedora 19+, which defaults to
MariaDB? I can see some activity in the bug tracker [2], but nothing
the last few months. In a related topic, when are RPMs for Fedora 20
[3] planned?
Is there any w
5 matches
Mail list logo