on the joiner i see:
WSREP: Failed to prepare for incremental state transfer: Local state UUID
(----) does not match group state UUID
(f74ffa7e-a5f2-11e6-b2a3-1fead9a6118d): 1 (Operation not permitted)
at galera/src/replicator_str.cpp:prepare_for_IST():482. IST will
Why exactly do you want to increase it?
because i think dns may slow down rsync
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Nirbhay Choubey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:22 PM, l vic wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to increase rsync timeout? I checked
>> http://galeracluster.com/documentation-webpag
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:22 PM, l vic wrote:
> Is it possible to increase rsync timeout? I checked
> http://galeracluster.com/documentation-webpages/galeraparameters.html
> but couldn't find corresponding parameters...
>
Currently, there is no way to configure rsync timeout other than editi
> What do you mean?
Sorry Sergei, my mistake, I mean Out Parameters,
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/out-parameters-in-prepare/
They are still there. I thought they were removed for some reason.
Rich
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-di
>From your previous answer about using node-name vs. node-address to
identify the node:
use wsrep-node-address; wsrep-node-name, OTOH, could be used to assign a
name to the node.
It helps identify the node in the error logs and can be used in
wsrep-sst-donor
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Nirbh
Is it possible to increase rsync timeout? I checked
http://galeracluster.com/documentation-webpages/galeraparameters.html
but couldn't find corresponding parameters...
Thanks,
-V
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to : maria-d
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, l vic wrote:
> How can i determine the donor node? Would that be seed node?
>
On the joiner you will see the following:
2016-11-08 12:13:57 140589576218368 [Note] WSREP: Member 1.0 (node2)
requested state transfer from '*any*'. Selected 0.0 (node1)(SYNCED) as
do
Hi, Richard!
On Nov 08, Richard Bensley wrote:
> Will we ever see a return of prepared statement parameters that were
> introduced then removed in 10.2?
What do you mean?
Regards,
Sergei
Chief Architect MariaDB
and secur...@mariadb.org
___
Mailing li
I would LOVE to see the SQL language receive extensions, or the ability to
plugin a scripting language; something useful like Guile or Lua (not
javascript, what is wrong with people?).
Will we ever see a return of prepared statement parameters that were
introduced then removed in 10.2?
I can achi
I don't see any log entries pertaining to node3 join on the donor nodes
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Nirbhay Choubey
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:50 AM, l vic wrote:
>
>> Have the rsync failure (see the trace below):
>>
>> 2016-11-08 15:17:34 139959897945856 [ERROR] WSREP: Failed
How can i determine the donor node? Would that be seed node?
Thank you
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Nirbhay Choubey
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:50 AM, l vic wrote:
>
>> Have the rsync failure (see the trace below):
>>
>> 2016-11-08 15:17:34 139959897945856 [ERROR] WSREP: Failed t
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:50 AM, l vic wrote:
> Have the rsync failure (see the trace below):
>
> 2016-11-08 15:17:34 139959897945856 [ERROR] WSREP: Failed to read 'ready
> ' from: wsrep_sst_rsync --role 'joiner' --address 'node3.frame.mesos'
> --datadir '/var/lib/mysql/' --parent '114' ''
> R
Have the rsync failure (see the trace below):
2016-11-08 15:17:34 139959897945856 [ERROR] WSREP: Failed to read 'ready
' from: wsrep_sst_rsync --role 'joiner' --address 'node3.frame.mesos'
--datadir '/var/lib/mysql/' --parent '114' ''
Read: '(null)'
2016-11-08 15:17:34 139959897945856 [ERROR] W
I forgot about 'async'. It is a multi-threaded asynchronous (and client
agnostic) SQL queue built entirely from MySQL primitives with no external
dependencies.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Justin Swanhart wrote:
> There are a great many uses for stored procedures. They can eliminate
> round
There are a great many uses for stored procedures. They can eliminate
round trips, and they can encapsulate logic in the database. It is a pity
that MySQL stored procedures are so limited that hey do not even
encapsulate the full standard, and require difficult constructs by not
implementing "for
2016-11-07 18:43 GMT+03:00 Sergei Golubchik :
> Hi, Federico!
>
> On Nov 07, Federico Razzoli wrote:
>> Some good points from Bill Karwin:
>> https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-reasons-not-to-use-or-not-use-stored-procedures/answer/Bill-Karwin
>
> Thanks.
>
> These are valid points, and some of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
