Hi,
Anyone in this distribution mail list who actually uses .Net + Entity
Framework with Maria DB in their production environment, could you please
mail me separately. Would like to check with you on few clarification.
Thank you for being a community and helping each others.
Regards,
Karthick
On
Hi GL,
Thanks for your assistance.
I am wondering whether this can be officially supported by Maria DB support
for enterprise customers in case if we face any issues wrt .net connector
(Ex: performance issues or similar) to connect to Maria DB.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Guillaume Lefranc
This is a question to ask to MariaDB support obviously :)
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:41 PM Karthick Subramanian <
ksubraman...@paycommerce.com> wrote:
> Hi GL,
>
> Thanks for your assistance.
>
> I am wondering whether this can be officially supported by Maria DB
> support for enterprise customers
You may use the MySQL Connector/NET, there is plenty of documentation for
it online.
e.g. https://dev.mysql.com/doc/connector-net/en/
GL
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:35 PM Karthick Subramanian <
ksubraman...@paycommerce.com> wrote:
All,
Currently we are using below:
.Net framework 4
Entity Framew
All,
Currently we are using below:
.Net framework 4
Entity Framework
ODP .Net to Oracle DB
New environment:
.Net framework 4
Entity Framework
MariaDB 10.1.16
We would like to know on how can we connect MariaDB for the above said
framework .Net + Entity Framework. We are trying to find some sou
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:26 AM, l vic wrote:
>
> Do I need to use "--wsrep-node-name" option with dns names to identify the
> node in Galera cluster instead of "wsrep-node-address", or is the
> "--wsrep-node-address=" supposed to work?
>
You should set wsrep-node-address.
wsrep-node-name,
Do I need to use "--wsrep-node-name" option with dns names to identify the
node in Galera cluster instead of "wsrep-node-address", or is the
"--wsrep-node-address=" supposed to work?
Thanks,
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to
Use ProxySQL to rewrite DROP DATABASE to a call to a store proc.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 3:43 AM, Lukas Lehner wrote:
>
> Thanks Rhys.
>
> Is there an other way? With your solution the customer can't use standard SQL
> (they are forced to use our procedure), which means much
I have a patch to be "DROP DATABASE need Super_priv"
https://gist.github.com/yoku0825/ec783f4f2b6350a860c4736ad4739d16
yoku0825,
2016-10-25 16:43 GMT+09:00 Lukas Lehner :
> Thanks Rhys.
>
> Is there an other way? With your solution the customer can't use standard
> SQL (they are forced to use
Thanks Rhys.
Is there an other way? With your solution the customer can't use standard
SQL (they are forced to use our procedure), which means much more support
requests.
best regards
Lukas
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:53 PM, wrote:
> Revoke the DROP permission from the user in question. Create a
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:51 AM LinuXperia wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I am having a Problem with getting mariadb works flawless using a
> Master/Slave[1] <=> Master/Slave[2] <=> Master/Slave[3]
>
> If you want to have synchronous replication across all 3 servers I would
NOT recommend using this ki
11 matches
Mail list logo
