- On 14 May, 2015, at 2:39 AM, roberto robe...@spadim.com.br wrote:
> i'm considering using spider engine or any other shard system with >100GB , or
> maybe a big raid-6 system,
> server is a xeon 8core with 16GB and 2hd 500GB RAID1 SAS (>180MB/s)
raid6 sounds like a sure way to compromise I
TokoDB is worth a shot certainly if your working set is disk bound.
Partitioning might also be an option for you.
From: Maria-discuss
[mailto:maria-discuss-bounces+rhys.campbell=tradingscreen@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Roberto Spadim
Sent: 13 May 2015 17:39
To: Maria Discuss
Subject:
hi guys, i'm with doubt about the "best" engine (best = no INSERT lag
~0.100s or less, good SELECT speed ~ 1 to 10 seconds is ok)
i have two tables, they only "receive" INSERT and SELECT queries (no
DELETE/UPDATE/ALTER)
they increase 200MB/day and 3.000.000 rows/day
my doubt is, how to have small
Hello All,
I have compiled mariadb 10.1.4 from source to have a play with innodb page
compression. Not sure if these are bug or misunderstanding on my part, probably
a combination of both...
I am running in a CentOS 7 x64 VirtualBox VM 10.1.4-MariaDB-wsrep. The compile
support for page compres
4 matches
Mail list logo
