Hi,
So I can run a SELECT my_func(blah) from some_table; and a breakpoint will
fire if my_func calls another function which calls another function and
that function has a breakpoint ? I fail to see how that is possible, but
if it is, please provide a technical description of how it works if it i
license?
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Peter Gulutzan wrote:
> Dear Alexander Barkov,
>
> Thanks for looking at the debugger feature of Ocelot's open-source GUI
> client.
> As you saw, ocelotgui supports breakpoints, flow control, and context
> inspection.
> Recently we added call-stack viewi
Dear Alexander Barkov,
Thanks for looking at the debugger feature of Ocelot's open-source GUI
client.
As you saw, ocelotgui supports breakpoints, flow control, and context
inspection.
Recently we added call-stack viewing and variable-changing, in the
source downloads.
The early-alpha release
Hi, Vladislav!
On Mar 12, Vladislav Vaintroub wrote:
>
> Hi Serg,
> On 03/12/15 09:17, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> > MariaDB Windows installer has a special dialog about it with a
> > checkbox that's enabled by default, if I'm not mistaken).
>
> I'm sorry, but you are mistaken :) Checkbox is off
Hi Serg,
On 03/12/15 09:17, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
MariaDB Windows installer has a special dialog about it with a
checkbox that's enabled by default, if I'm not mistaken).
I'm sorry, but you are mistaken :) Checkbox is off by default.
Also, at some point in the past I compared the download
Hi, Jeremy!
On Mar 12, Jeremy Cole wrote:
>
> > But asking people to "please enable the feedback plugin" just
> > doesn't work. It seems that most of our users don't care about it at
> > all - I mean, they don't care whether it's enabled or not, and don't
> > care to do anything. That is, if the
Sergei,
> But asking people to "please enable the feedback plugin" just doesn't
> work. It seems that most of our users don't care about it at all - I
> mean, they don't care whether it's enabled or not, and don't care to do
> anything. That is, if the plugin is disabled - it'll stay disabled,
>
Why not make it pay-per-call? If this is valuable for MariaDB.com then they
can pay the submitter for each report. Maybe this is a great use for
bitcoin.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, Ian!
>
> On Mar 11, Ian Gilfillan wrote:
> > I understand that the statistics w
Hi, Ian!
On Mar 11, Ian Gilfillan wrote:
> I understand that the statistics would have some meaning, and
> understand that there's no actual data being sent, etc.
>
> However, enabling the feedback plugin by default IS going to create a
> whole lot of negative publicity for MariaDB. Is the limite
But it depends on functionalities available only in a Linux shell, I think,
and is not cross-platform?
Further I agree with Federico that it is a server-side *API* we need, so
that functionalities are exposed to any client that wants to use it.
-- Peter
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Alexande
Hi,
One more thing: The UDF interface is stuck in the 2000s (3.23 timeframe).
It has not, and can not, change. So your only option for returning complex
data is through a string anyway, so using a delimited string or packing a
blob are really the only options. Maybe someday this bug:
http://bugs
Hi,
Where is it described exactly what is collected? Descriptions I see say it
is "basically ..." well, no, I want a full description of all data
collected, particularly if it collects versions of software as knowing what
version of software I'm running lets you know what I'm vulnerable to.
Is
I am no lawyer, but please consider possible legal problems for users.
1) I sign an NDA with my customer
2) I enable Feedback
3) You see things I shouldn't reveal.
I know that my data are not sent. And you say it's anonymous.
But you will have at least the server's IP and MAC.
The real problem is n
13 matches
Mail list logo
