Hi, Federico!
On Dec 14, Federico Razzoli wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In MySQL 5.7 documentation:
>
> https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/innodb-parameters.html
>
> I read:
>
> "As of MySQL 5.7.5, the InnoDB storage engine can no longer be
> disabled, and the --innodb=OFF and --skip-innodb options ar
Hi elena!
I'm considering all engines
The query
insert into table select max(pk)+1 from table;
Should be executed different with different storage engines? Or the results
should be the same?
For example, i consider that
max(pk)+1
Will always get the highest value of pk, and never insert a duplic
Am 14.12.2014 um 11:22 schrieb Federico Razzoli:
In MySQL 5.7 documentation:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/innodb-parameters.html
I read:
"As of MySQL 5.7.5, the InnoDB storage engine can no longer be disabled, and the
--innodb=OFF and --skip-innodb options are deprecated and have
Hi.
In MySQL 5.7 documentation:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/innodb-parameters.html
I read:
"As of MySQL 5.7.5, the InnoDB storage engine can no longer be disabled, and
the --innodb=OFF and --skip-innodb options are deprecated and have no effect.
Their use results in a warning. The
Roberto,
On 14.12.2014 8:37, Roberto Spadim wrote:
Hi Elena!
2014-12-13 21:02 GMT-02:00 Elena Stepanova :
I suppose you forgot to mention that you are doing it on an Aria table,
concurrently, simultaneously from several threads?
no, i'm considering any engine, just to know when it's possibl
5 matches
Mail list logo
