On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:55:58 +0200, Walter Heck wrote:
> I think it would be fair to take into account both the things Colin
> and Stewart have said as many of them are correct, but their words
> should also be taken with a grain of salt as they work for the
> companies that would benefit heavily
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:33:50 +0100, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
> On 16.02.2012 00:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> > Percona Server is like MariaDB in that both of them are compatible
> > with MySQL and you could do a plug-and-play replacement. Percona
> > Server is much closer to MySQL (which many think is
I agree 100%.
Even though I'm a huge fan of PostgreSQL*,* if the standard database has
been MySQL, then the next release must stay MySQL or something that's a
drop-in replacement of (e.g. MariaDB).
After all, those using PostgreSQL are skillful enough to know how to
install PostgreSQL when they n
Great stuff,
What ever the choice, even if it is to keep MySQL alone, lets remember
MySQL will not be dropped ! Any one would still be able to install the
Oracle GA if they wanted to (from some repository, probably partner, or
even main)
If indeed there is a replacement, I can only talk about wha
As an end user, I would most strongly dislike this. You clearly don't
understand how corporate users think and operate, how they work with open
source technologies, and how they plan and evolve their technical
roadmaps.
Last year Ubuntu inflicted enough damage on itself by messing up with UI
and
Hi!
On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:24, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> Clearly I was unclear in my previous email. The 2 year support is not
> true for any of the alternatives. MySQL gives 5 years (and more for
> customers that pay), Percona trails MySQL so they also end up doing 5
> years (and more for paying custo
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Walter Heck wrote:
> As for MariaDB, I like their much more community driven development
> that seems less commercially driven,
...
> At this point I think MariaDB would probably be a better match for
> being in the main ubuntu/debian distro's as their whole ecosy
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
> More features even though they only apply to niche user are in general
> nothing bad.
Many DBAs tend to be very conservative and like a less is more
approach, but personally I agree with you. I wish there was fork with
everything: all the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.02.2012 09:55, Walter Heck wrote:
> I think it would be fair to take into account both the things
> Colin and Stewart have said as many of them are correct, but their
> words should also be taken with a grain of salt as they work for
> the compan
I think it would be fair to take into account both the things Colin
and Stewart have said as many of them are correct, but their words
should also be taken with a grain of salt as they work for the
companies that would benefit heavily from having 'their' fork be the
replacement of mysql. That's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 16.02.2012 08:40, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Bjoern Boschman
> wrote:
>> On 16.02.2012 00:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
>>> Percona Server is like MariaDB in that both of them are
>>> compatible with MySQL and you could do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 16.02.2012 00:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> Percona Server is like MariaDB in that both of them are compatible
> with MySQL and you could do a plug-and-play replacement. Percona
> Server is much closer to MySQL (which many think is great), shall
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
