On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
> On 16.02.2012 00:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
>> Percona Server is like MariaDB in that both of them are compatible
>> with MySQL and you could do a plug-and-play replacement. Percona
>> Server is much closer to MySQL (which many think is great),
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Colin Charles wrote:
>> There is also a fourth MySQL fork: Percona Server. It is interesting
>> to note people in this thread and in general the Linux distro people
>> seem to omit this when talking about MySQL forks. As far as I'm aware
>> it is the most popular o
The MariaDB project would like to announce the availability of MariaDB
5.3.4-rc, the latest addition to our growing lineup of supported
software. MariaDB 5.3.4-rc is the second Release Candidate release in
the 5.3 series. We hope to follow it up soon with a stable (GA)
5.3 release.
== MariaDB 5.3
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:42:34 +0800, Colin Charles
wrote:
> On 16 Feb 2012, at 10:01, Stewart Smith wrote:
> > Maybe somebody can point out how RHEL/Fedora do multiple web servers or
> > email servers as that's essentially what we have here. Surely things
> > like nginx, lighttpd and postfix are a
Hi!
On 16 Feb 2012, at 07:57, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Fabio T. Leitao
> wrote:
>> For those who have not followed this up closely, a little history.
>>
>> Remember that MariaDB is not just "compatible" with MySQL, but it kind of IS
>> MySQL, forked and re-branded.
Hi!
On 16 Feb 2012, at 10:01, Stewart Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:31:05 +0800, Colin Charles
> wrote:
>> To remain backward compatible, the idea of using the same port number,
>> data files, etc. seem to be in play. If we are to apply for a new port
>> number we have to change the prot
Hi!
On 15 Feb 2012, at 00:49, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> We are unable to determine what the recent MySQL security fixes are due
> to lack of details, and unclear commit messages.
Based on our analysis of commits and bugs, we believe the CPU (critical patch
update) that Oracle released was actua
Hi!
On 14 Feb 2012, at 20:28, Fabio T. Leitao wrote:
> Remember that MariaDB is not just "compatible" with MySQL, but it kind of IS
> MySQL, forked and re-branded.
I like to say that it is MySQL, branched and re-branded with additional
features. It is not a fork. We rebase with MySQL on a regu
Hi!
On 14 Feb 2012, at 00:11, Robbie Williamson wrote:
> One thing to note, the primary motivator for this proposal isn't about
> moving to a more "open source friendly" application. We have genuine
> security concerns/issues with how MySQL handles and publishes their
> security updates. We can
Hi!
On 13 Feb 2012, at 15:20, Eddie Bachle wrote:
> As Linux gains more public recognition, more and more Windows-only
> organizations will consider using it as an alternative, especially for their
> web servers. This is especially true because of the fact that each of the
> necessarily main
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:31:05 +0800, Colin Charles wrote:
> To remain backward compatible, the idea of using the same port number,
> data files, etc. seem to be in play. If we are to apply for a new port
> number we have to change the protocol to some extent
We have the same issue with Percona Serv
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Fabio T. Leitao
wrote:
> For those who have not followed this up closely, a little history.
>
> Remember that MariaDB is not just "compatible" with MySQL, but it kind of IS
> MySQL, forked and re-branded.
>
> In 2009, even before Oracle has purchased Sun, Monty Wid
12 matches
Mail list logo
