Hi Monty
On 08/10/2009, at 8:48 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
Arjen> Dual would only make sense for discrete/distinct components,
but even
Arjen> there it might be easier to just have it be GPL or BSD.
This is for the case where the customer does not want to have the code
under GPL. BSD is not
Hi!
> "Arjen" == Arjen Lentz writes:
Arjen> Hi Monty, Henrik
Arjen> On 07/10/2009, at 12:34 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>> I still think it's quite long and not much easier to understand that
>> what we have now:
>>
>> "Monty Program Ab agrees that when it dual licenses code, it will not
>
Hi!
> "Henrik" == Henrik Ingo writes:
Henrik> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Michael Widenius
wrote:
>>> "Henrik" == Henrik Ingo writes:
>>
Henrik> Hi all
Henrik> As Monty blogged some time ago
Henrik>
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/08/thoughts-about-dual-licensing-open.html
Hi Monty, all
On 08/10/2009, at 5:24 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
It would be nice if Sun also could work with BSD, but we have learned
the hard way that they don't accept code under the BSD license :(
You mean Sun/MySQL then, because for Drizzle, Sun does work with BSD
code.
That's actually
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Arjen Lentz wrote:
>> Hi Monty, Henrik
>>
>> On 07/10/2009, at 12:34 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>>>
>>> I still think it's quite long and not much easier to understand that
>>> what we have now:
>>>
>>> "Monty
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Arjen Lentz wrote:
> On 07/10/2009, at 12:34 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> I still think it's quite long and not much easier to understand that
>> what we have now:
>>
>
> In that case you might as well just keep it all GPL or BSD and sell it
> rather than dual
6 matches
Mail list logo
