solve the bug, without any
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260821
[2] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/mysql-secure-installation.html
[3] https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/mysql_secure_installation/
--
I would like your general opinion about this.
Based on it, I can file issu
cgi?id=1205082
[2]
mysql_find_rows
mysqlaccess
mysql_convert_table_format
mysql_fix_extensions
mysql_setpermission
mysql_zap
mysqldumpslow
mysqld_multi
mysqlhotcopy
--
Michal Schorm
Core Services - Databases Team
mail: msch...@redhat.com
Brno-IRC: mschorm
___
M
ompatibile with "libmariadb.so.3"? Both API and
ABI?
Many packages in Fedora depends on "libmysqlclient.so".
I would like to pack 10.2 to Fedora, but I can't before all those packages
move to the libmariadb library.
It would be considerably easier transfer for me, if all t
ly, you provide 2 binaries:
mysql_config
mariadb_config
I guess, you plan to remove mysql_config some versions later?
Are there any notable (compatibility) differences between them?
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:12 AM,
ts
first attemps in Fedora, however it is always pleasure to cooperate with
developers like you :)
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to
ecoginiton?
%{_datadir}/mariadb/mysql.server
%{_datadir}/%{pkg_name}/mysqld_multi.server
- those shouldn't be needed on systemd OSs ?
/usr/bin/mytop
- you (mariaDB) do not ship this file
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databas
used elsewhere from TokuDB ?
2) If yes, what all would be affected?
Could any issues arise during update from build without Jemalloc to
build with it?
Any expected performance changes?
3) Would be the use of the bundled Jemalloc (on of the) best option(s)?
4) Anything else that I missed?
--
Michal S
ce tarball ?
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Thanks for the reply
2) Yes, my bad.
3) Issue filed
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 6:04 AM, daniel wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 18:46:35 +0200
> Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>>
&g
n any
case.
Before I'll start to dig further, I'm stopping by on this list, making sure
it is possible.
- is it currently supported?
- have I overlooked any related CMake argument?
Links:
MariaDB in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb/tree/master
--
Michal Schor
be used
for MySQL 8.
That makes problems for nearly every Linux OS, beacuse they chose MariaDB
over MySQL as the default implemetation.
I'd like to know the MariaDB stance to it.
Do you see it as an issue as well?
Are there any plans to deal with it? How?
Michal Schorm
--
Michal Schorm
As
Great!
It will save a lot of trouble between MariaDB and MySQL.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:06 PM Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, Michal!
>
> It was incorrect.
> I've now
Hello,
can I get some status update on MDEV-13912 please?
It is still an issue for the customer on my side and I'd love to see
fixed it in 5.5.62 release.
Michal
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Re
Thank you,
Michal
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:24 PM Sergei Golubchik wrote:
>
> Hi, Michal!
>
> On Oct 19, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > Hello,
> > can I get some status update on MDEV-13912 ple
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:16 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have a questions regarding the warnings showing up at 10.2 and 10.3
> releases:
>
> When upgrading from MariaDB 10.2.16 or earlier to MariaDB 10.2.17 or higher,
> running mysql_upgrade is required due to
Hello,
can somebody please take a brief look to atleast evaulate, how hard it
would be to backoport the patch form the latest library versions?
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-18684
Thank you
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
) Version upgrade
Is there any reason to use other than latest GA release of those connectors?
(e.g. to use CONC/C 3.0 series instead of 3.1 series)
Perhaps when using against different MariaDB server major versions?
I assume there is not.
If there is, again - why was CONC/ODBC 3.0 discontinued and
about the differences inside the same
major version "3", so I meant "3.0" vs "3.1".
I still would love to get the answers from the CONC/C project
mainatiner(s) or developer(s).
I guess the right person would be Georg Richter, based on the JIRA
"assignee"
Yes, that is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks!
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
--
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:14 PM Georg Richter wrote:
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> about ABI breakage:
>
> Since MySQL 4.1 all public structures like MYSQL
dup, my_realloc, my_strdup,
my_snprintf (Compromise
for both sides, but can rise more issues later)
Are there any reasons to not support dynamic libraries?
What could be the best solution from your point of view?
Cheers,
Michal
--
Michal Schorm
Core Services - Databases Team
mail: msch...@
20 matches
Mail list logo
