Hi Kristian,
Kristian Nielsen wrote:
>
>> The poor performance of MySQL with 1 database is expected. However MySQL is
>> much better with 32 databases. Even better than MariaDB :(
>
> Ok, so I looked closer at the numbers (of which there were quite a few, thanks
> for doing this work :-). I have
Axel Schwenke writes:
> The poor performance of MySQL with 1 database is expected. However MySQL is
> much better with 32 databases. Even better than MariaDB :(
Ok, so I looked closer at the numbers (of which there were quite a few, thanks
for doing this work :-). I have some idea of what could
Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> A couple of things that can be adjusted are --slave-domain-parallel-threads
> and --slave-parallel-max-queued. But I wouldn't expect them to have much
> effect on a sysbench load. If you want, you could try increase
> --slave-parallel-max-queued and set --slave-domain-par
Axel Schwenke writes:
>> In this test, are you sure that you are running MariaDB in GTID mode?
>>
>> CHANGE MASTER TO master_use_gtid=slave_pos
>
> Yes. This is how the shell code looks:
>
> mysql -S ${SLAVE_SOCKET} -u root -e "SET GLOBAL gtid_slave_pos=''"
> mysql -S ${SLAVE_SOCKET} -u root
Axel Schwenke writes:
> The poor performance of MySQL with 1 database is expected. However MySQL is
> much better with 32 databases. Even better than MariaDB :(
I haven't had time to go through all the numbers and details yet, but just a
quick check:
In this test, are you sure that you are runn
Hi Kristian,
Am 25.03.2014 15:55, schrieb Kristian Nielsen:
> Axel Schwenke writes:
>
>> The poor performance of MySQL with 1 database is expected. However MySQL is
>> much better with 32 databases. Even better than MariaDB :(
>
> I haven't had time to go through all the numbers and details yet
6 matches
Mail list logo
