Arjen Lentz writes:
> We filed a wishlist bug for this,
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maria/+bug/470580 which also includes a
> patch by Antony Curtis. It creates a mysql-
> glob.h during the build process, which we could put into a mariadb-
> plugin-dev package.
>
> Then, some mariadb- pack
Let me add that the 'mysql-essentials' download package is very popular with
Windows users (it includes InnoDB, though!). I think MariaDB should be
careful not to make the default download too big. Not that bandwidth and
disk space is a big problem for most users nowadays. But it seems people
want
Hi Henrik
On 05/11/2009, at 11:44 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote:
Just to throw another idea out there, we've had talks about
re-introducing something like mariadb-max packaging. The idea would be
that a basic mariadb install should not only be stable, but for most
people should be reasonably small. Havi
Hi Kristian, Hakan,
On 04/11/2009, at 10:40 PM, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
Arjen Lentz writes:
packages before they will try things. If 5.1 binaries had had PBXT
plugin sitting there, lots more people would have tried it earlier,
filed bugreports and feedback, and Paul would have been where he is
Arjen Lentz writes:
> packages before they will try things. If 5.1 binaries had had PBXT
> plugin sitting there, lots more people would have tried it earlier,
> filed bugreports and feedback, and Paul would have been where he is
> now much quicker. With MariaDB pulling it in it's ok now, but it's
+ there should be documentation of reasonable standard available for such
engine.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 15:01, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > "Arjen" == Arjen Lentz writes:
>
> Arjen> Hi all, fellow Maria captains in particular (but naturally anybody
> Arjen> here can comment)
>
> A
Hi!
> "Arjen" == Arjen Lentz writes:
Arjen> Hi all, fellow Maria captains in particular (but naturally anybody
Arjen> here can comment)
Arjen> We'd like to include the plugin for OQGRAPH engine in the 5.1 packages
Arjen> we're just about to build.
Arjen> It would not be pulled in like
Noting also Hakan's and Alex' comments...
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Arjen Lentz wrote:
> We'd like to include the plugin for OQGRAPH engine in the 5.1 packages we're
> just about to build.
> It would not be pulled in like the xtradb/pbxt engines, but be compiled
> separately and not loade
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:15:31 +0100, Hakan Kuecuekyilmaz
wrote:
> On 30.10.2009, at 21:35, Arjen Lentz wrote:
>> The rationale is this.
>> From the experience with PBXT, people really want/need binaries/
>> packages before they will try things. If 5.1 binaries had had PBXT
>> plugin sitting the
Arjen, all,
I like the idea of putting community developed storage engines into
our releases.
On 30.10.2009, at 21:35, Arjen Lentz wrote:
Hi all, fellow Maria captains in particular (but naturally anybody
here can comment)
We'd like to include the plugin for OQGRAPH engine in the 5.1
pack
Hi all, fellow Maria captains in particular (but naturally anybody
here can comment)
We'd like to include the plugin for OQGRAPH engine in the 5.1 packages
we're just about to build.
It would not be pulled in like the xtradb/pbxt engines, but be
compiled separately and not loaded in by defa
11 matches
Mail list logo
