Re: [Maria-developers] impact of segmented table_open_cache on sysbench results

2013-03-16 Thread MARK CALLAGHAN
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Axel Schwenke wrote: > Hi Mark, > > MARK CALLAGHAN wrote: > > > I didn't see a big change in going from toci=1 to toci=64. I don't > > dispute your results, but I am curious about why it made a difference > > for you but not for me. My sysbench test had: > > * 8 t

Re: [Maria-developers] impact of segmented table_open_cache on sysbench results

2013-03-15 Thread Axel Schwenke
Hi Mark, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote: > I didn't see a big change in going from toci=1 to toci=64. I don't > dispute your results, but I am curious about why it made a difference > for you but not for me. My sysbench test had: > * 8 tables, partitioning not used > * 8 copies of the sysbench process (1 p

Re: [Maria-developers] impact of segmented table_open_cache on sysbench results

2013-03-15 Thread MARK CALLAGHAN
I didn't see a big change in going from toci=1 to toci=64. I don't dispute your results, but I am curious about why it made a difference for you but not for me. My sysbench test had: * 8 tables, partitioning not used * 8 copies of the sysbench process (1 per table), running a different host from my