Monday 15 March 2010 11:47:43 Henrik Ingo wrote:
> The points in favor of worklog would be
+ it's independent of bzr. Compared to git, bzr seems to have only the
launchpad integration as the selling point. Moving to blueprints gives us an
additional argument for staying with bzr.
If Canonical w
Monday 15 March 2010 11:49:49 Henrik Ingo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> > ability to remove hours
> >Somebody mentioned that a number of hours could be
> >increased by mistake, and there should be a way to decrease
> >is back. I'm not convinced it'
And the data is the important part... I think it's a good idea, but I am
just trying to bring up a counterpoint that might not have been discussed.
On Mar 15, 2010 9:08 AM, "Timour Katchaounov" wrote:
Adam,
> I might also add...
>
> *What happens when/if Canonical/Ubuntu goes bunk?
>
> Using
Adam,
I might also add...
*What happens when/if Canonical/Ubuntu goes bunk?
Using all of the tools provided by one vendor can be a great thing but not
if the vendor's existence is "tenuous." If that happens, how easy would it
be to migrate data away from the vendor and would we even have that
I might also add...
*What happens when/if Canonical/Ubuntu goes bunk?
Using all of the tools provided by one vendor can be a great thing but not
if the vendor's existence is "tenuous." If that happens, how easy would it
be to migrate data away from the vendor and would we even have that option?
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> ability to remove hours
> Somebody mentioned that a number of hours could be
> increased by mistake, and there should be a way to decrease
> is back. I'm not convinced it's a good idea, though.
Then again, it should also not be e
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Feel free to suggest more or "get rid of WL, use X instead",
Just to update you on discussion we've had last August (I think).
Our, or at least my, current thinking is that worklog is currently
used as a "default" option since it is the t
Thursday 04 March 2010 10:42:09 Oleksandr Byelkin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 3 марта 2010, в 18:07, Sergei Golubchik написал(а):
> [skip]
>
> > ability to remove hours
> >Somebody mentioned that a number of hours could be
> >increased by mistake, and there should be a way to decrease
> >is bac
Hi!
3 марта 2010, в 18:07, Sergei Golubchik написал(а):
[skip]
ability to remove hours
Somebody mentioned that a number of hours could be
increased by mistake, and there should be a way to decrease
is back. I'm not convinced it's a good idea, though.
Actually it would be better to b
Wednesday 03 March 2010 17:07:13 Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> ability to remove hours
> Somebody mentioned that a number of hours could be
> increased by mistake, and there should be a way to decrease
> is back. I'm not convinced it's a good idea, though.
You can't assume that people do
Hi.
That's a rough list of enhancement ideas for worklog.
Some of them I'm going to do (but not all).
Feel free to suggest more or "get rid of WL, use X instead",
just don't forget the "because of" part.
report: easy to do tasks
make it to provide a list of "low-handing fruits", tasks that
11 matches
Mail list logo
