Hi, Kristian!
On Mar 11, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergei Golubchik writes:
>
> >> - Will tend to discourage making desirable changes, as the
> >> procedure becomes more complicated (more work to track versioned
> >> API, less flexibitily in what C++ language constructs can be
> >> used); an
Sergei Golubchik writes:
> On Feb 27, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
>> This basically means that all data and code needs to be exported via
>> the WL#3859 framework, not using the system linker as is currently
>> done.
>
> Yes.
>> - Will tend to discourage making desirable changes, as the procedure
Hi, Kristian!
On Feb 27, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
>
> While we were discussing a generic I/O layer in MariaDB, Sergei
> brought up the issue of WL#3859. This worklog carries a principal
> issue that I wanted to mention and discuss.
>
> Sergei, if I understood you correctly, you said that Sun MySQ
While we were discussing a generic I/O layer in MariaDB, Sergei brought up the
issue of WL#3859. This worklog carries a principal issue that I wanted to
mention and discuss.
Sergei, if I understood you correctly, you said that Sun MySQL would never
take a new internal API that does not follow the
4 matches
Mail list logo
