hi!
> "Arjen" == Arjen Lentz writes:
Arjen> Hi Sergey
Arjen> On 19/06/2009, at 8:12 PM, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:08AM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
>>> This brings up a question for the Maria dev team-what are your
>>> plans, if
>>> any, for replication suppor
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:46:04PM +1000, Arjen Lentz wrote:
> Hi Sergey
>
> On 19/06/2009, at 8:12 PM, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:08AM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
>>> This brings up a question for the Maria dev team-what are your plans, if
>>> any, for replication supp
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Robert
> Hodges wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have the same question as Mark, namely: what is the prioritized list
> of
> > possible improvements to replication? To answer Mark's other question,
> > impro
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Robert
Hodges wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have the same question as Mark, namely: what is the prioritized list of
> possible improvements to replication? To answer Mark's other question,
> improving replication is work that we (Continuent) would be willing to help
> f
Hi All,
I have the same question as Mark, namely: what is the prioritized list of
possible improvements to replication? To answer Mark's other question,
improving replication is work that we (Continuent) would be willing to help
fund. Improvements in this area seem like a great way for MariaDB
Hi all,
I would like to post a clarification as my first message may have created
some unintended confusion. We are working with Monty and Ethan O¹Rafferty
to figure out how to work together on our respective releases, which
includes where to post them. So my question at the end is not relevan
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Arjen Lentz wrote:
> Hi Sergey
>
> On 19/06/2009, at 8:12 PM, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:08AM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
>>>
>>> This brings up a question for the Maria dev team-what are your plans, if
>>> any, for replication suppor
Hi Sergey
On 19/06/2009, at 8:12 PM, Sergey Petrunya wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:08AM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
This brings up a question for the Maria dev team-what are your
plans, if
any, for replication support in MariaDB? In particular, are there
any
plans that would affect
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:08AM -0700, Robert Hodges wrote:
> This brings up a question for the Maria dev team-what are your plans, if
> any, for replication support in MariaDB? In particular, are there any
> plans that would affect binlog formats?
So far we don't have any planne
Hi Arjen,
Thanks for the response. I really appreciate the guidance-are these patches to
your knowledge already in the current 5.4 builds? We have not done any work
yet to accommodate 5.4 format changes. I need to check these as it's our
policy to try to support over time a reasonably comple
Hi Robert
On 12/06/2009, at 1:45 AM, Robert Hodges wrote:
This is a heads-up that we are actively testing Tungsten Replicator
against the latest MariaDB build and hope to complete initial
certification this week. So far there are no problems. We are also
going to add a feature to use Mari
Hi All,
This is a heads-up that we are actively testing Tungsten Replicator against the
latest MariaDB build and hope to complete initial certification this week. So
far there are no problems. We are also going to add a feature to use Maria for
our catalog tables instead of InnoDB. Tungsten
12 matches
Mail list logo
