the fail, hopefully.
Thanks, James.
--- On Fri, 6/14/13, Elena Stepanova wrote:
> From: Elena Stepanova
> Subject: Re: [Maria-developers] Process suggestion for minor issues
> To: "Sergei Golubchik"
> Cc: maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: Friday, June
Dnia 14-06-2013 o 12:27:22 Rasmus Johansson
napisał(a):
Hi MariaDB Developers,
This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
Please provide your thoughts. Do you think it's an OK way to deal with
the minors or do you pr
maybe creating a project (in jira) about mariadb docs, could allow do do
this, instead using the MDEV project, create a MDOC project to
documentation or a MQA (quality) that should do test, documentation and
quality features (code standard, benchmark etc etc )
at least if anyone know about somethin
In my opinion many of the new features of MariaDB lacks some proper
documentation/benchmarks and sometimes even testing, there are many
features and new variables that could be used but almost nobody knows
about these or the possible usecases/downsides are not clear and users
will just keep it
(warning: it's a long one)
Hi Sergei,
On 6/14/2013 6:26 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Elena!
On Jun 14, Elena Stepanova wrote:
On 6/14/2013 2:27 PM, Rasmus Johansson wrote:
Here is a suggested process to handle the ever growing amount of
minors. If a minor issue isn't fixed after two conse
about quality assurance process, what should be done? unit tests? test team?
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help :
i like the today jira process, if you want a higher priority, do some job
solving the problem, after that we could have NEW FEATURE in JIRA, like:
send the patch and marke the issue to "PLEASE REVIEW I HAVE SENT A
SOLUTION!" (i don't remember but when this occur i set the issue to major
(sorry i wi
Hi Kristian,
On 6/14/2013 5:39 PM, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
Rasmus Johansson writes:
This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
Please provide your thoughts. Do you think it's an OK way to deal with
the minors or do you
Rasmus Johansson writes:
> This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
> and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
> Please provide your thoughts. Do you think it's an OK way to deal with
> the minors or do you prefer some other way?
The whole Jira thing is a farce.
Hi,
On 6/14/2013 2:27 PM, Rasmus Johansson wrote:
Hi MariaDB Developers,
This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
Currently, the process we use makes a clear differentiation between
major or higher prioirty issues (calle
Hi MariaDB Developers,
This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
Currently, the process we use makes a clear differentiation between
major or higher prioirty issues (called majors altogether after this)
and minor or lower pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
