Hi Sergey,
On 11/9/21 11:48, Sergey Petrunia wrote:
Hi Elena,
The patch for https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-26929 has been merged from
10.4 into all versions up to 10.8.
Could you enable the optimizer trace run in the buildbot please?
An extra step mtr_opttrace has been added in the old
Hi Otto,
On 3/18/21 8:50 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Hello!
I noticed there are quite a lot of upgrade test failures on the 10.5
branch, which is a stable release and should definitely be all green
all the time.
Here is quick review of those issues with suggested fixes. Maybe
Daniel or Elena ca
hat tested initially, but
there are no regular regression tests for it, so it can get broken.
If somebody on the list wants to contribute MTR tests for the feature,
please let me know, it will be much appreciated.
Regards,
Elena
2016-11-11 15:09 GMT+02:00 Elena Stepanova :
Hi Laurynas,
On
Hi Laurynas,
On 11/11/2016 12:41 PM, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
MariaDB -
On 10.1 branch, grep on mysql-test for encrypt.binlog returns
We have an open JIRA task for creating binlog encryption tests, it's on me.
Unfortunately, it's been badly delayed due to the lack of time.
Regards,
Elena
Hi Alexander,
On 11/09/2016 07:45 PM, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hello Elena,
On 11/09/2016 08:38 PM, Elena Stepanova wrote:
Hi Bar, Sanja,
On 11/09/2016 06:28 PM, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hello Sanja, Elena, Wlad,
Sanja, please review a patch for MDEV-10780.
The patch is for 10.1. I could
Hi Bar, Sanja,
On 11/09/2016 06:28 PM, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hello Sanja, Elena, Wlad,
Sanja, please review a patch for MDEV-10780.
The patch is for 10.1. I could not reproduce it in 10.0.
But it should be safe to push it into 10.0 anyway.
Yes, please push into 10.0 if it's safe enough, I
Hi,
On 11/07/2016 08:59 PM, Vicențiu Ciorbaru wrote:
Hi!
I'm wondering if it makes sense to have an automatic cleanup process for
branches older than X months?
Please don't do that. It happens that some work is delayed for really
long period of time.
Neither the first (by date) nor the secon
iadb-10.0.26-92-g5ac5050)
parent(s): 05f61ba46046ca835071a73b9255e787dcce9255
author: Elena Stepanova
committer: Elena Stepanova
timestamp: 2016-08-22 14:38:27 +0300
message:
MDEV-10604 Disable unstable MTR tests by default
- add new syntax to disabled.def in MTR to distinguish "unstable"
tests from disab
ut of executing the following:
show table status like 'tableX';
check table tableX;
select * from tableX;
SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE a AS result FROM tableX UNION DISTINCT SELECT b FROM
tableX;
If you don't have the command-line client, please just provide results
of the queries in any fo
Hi Alexander,
It's https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9739
Regards,
Elena
On 18.03.2016 15:46, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hello Olivier,
a few tests are failing in the main 10.1 tree on Linux:
connect.xml
connect.xml_grant
connect.xml_html
connect.xml_mdev5261
connect.xml_mult
Can you please
Hi Alexander, Sergei,
I've created a JIRA issue for this:
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9679
At the first glance it seems that the problem was introduced not long
ago, I mentioned the suspected push in the report. I was able to
reproduce it locally and will try to check if it indeed sta
Hi Serg, Jan,
On 01.10.2015 16:01, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Jan!
That's not a good idea. It'd mean that installing a plugin is not
enough, it must be explicitly enabled. I don't see any reason why one
should be forced to do it.
My reasoning while creating the bug report is that the plugin
Sorry, correction inline.
On 06.08.2015 14:47, Elena Stepanova wrote:
Hi Sergei,
On 06.08.2015 11:21, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Elena!
On Aug 06, ele...@montyprogram.com wrote:
revision-id: 69704b6c6f895fa706f83bcd3bcefe267aaf8e57
parent(s): afd59b575a75ebbc57f71ce2865fdff85e3e233b
Hi Sergei,
On 06.08.2015 11:21, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Elena!
On Aug 06, ele...@montyprogram.com wrote:
revision-id: 69704b6c6f895fa706f83bcd3bcefe267aaf8e57
parent(s): afd59b575a75ebbc57f71ce2865fdff85e3e233b
committer: Elena Stepanova
branch nick: bb-10.1-elenst
timestamp: 2015-08-06
Hi Daniel,
On 22.04.2015 2:36, Daniel Black wrote:
Hi,
Seems MariaDB has an active Coverity project
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/284 ...
but it hasn't been looked at for a while.
It's one of many things on the list:
https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-6262 .
Regards,
Elena
Hi Sergei,
http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2015-March/007508.html
Could you please check patch for
https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-7643 (MTR creates nested links
when tests are run with --mem)? It's in the area that you looked at
recently, so you might think of something
Hi Kristian,
Could you please take a quick look at the patch for MDEV-7107 (Sporadic
test failure in multi_source.multisource).
http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2015-March/007543.html
I don't expect you'll mind changes to the test itself, we discussed
earlier that's how SHOW SLAVE
Hi Otto,
On 04.02.2015 7:29, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Hello Elena,
I asked you on IRC in December about if the mtr run, as it is now
called from debian/rules, is optimal and sensible for in-distro build
time testing?
Canonical staff did these changes to MySQL 5.6, do you think we should
follow s
Hi,
On 22.12.2014 13:26, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Alexander!
On Dec 22, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hi Sergei, Kristian,
I'm looking at:
MDEV-7268 Column of table cannot be converted from type 'decimal(0,?)'
to type ' 'decimal(10,7)'
This bug cannot be fixed in general case, because the old
Hi Alexander, Kentoku,
On 12.11.2014 15:26, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hello Kentoku,
This test is failing in the latest builds on BB:
mroonga/wrapper.version_56_or_later_performance_schema
http://buildbot.askmonty.org/buildbot/builders/bld-dan-release/builds/1793/steps/test/logs/stdio
This is
Hi Rasmus,
On 22.09.2014 17:04, Rasmus Johansson wrote:
Hello all,
I will later today switch on the usage of Components in Jira.
Components are a way of grouping issues inside a project. The idea is
to map every issue in Jira, being it a bug or a new feature to a
component which describes to wh
es a chart with updated results
for both strategies and different modes. If you think I should add
anything else, please let me know.
Here it is:
https://github.com/pabloem/Kokiri/blob/master/RESULTS.md
Thank you very much.
Regards
Pablo
On 8/13/14, Elena Stepanova wrote:
Hi Pablo,
On 10.0
ata and
different parameters (modes, metrics etc.), to have the statistical
results with the latest code, which we'll use later to decide on the
final configuration.
Regards,
Elena
Regards
Pablo
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Elena Stepanova
wrote:
Hi Pablo,
Thanks for the up
features
seem to be working okay. Of course, the more prediction rounds for new
platforms, the platform mode improves a bit, but not too dramatically, for
what I've seen. I'll test it a bit more.
I will also add these features to the file_change_correlations branch, and
document everything
(sorry, forgot the list in my reply, resending)
Hi Pablo,
On 03.08.2014 17:51, Pablo Estrada wrote:
> Hi Elena,
>
>
>> One thing that I want to see there is fully developed platform mode.
I see
>> that mode option is still there, so it should not be difficult. I
actually
>> did it myself whi
of prediction and update of results (depending on
the length of the input list, and number of modified files for the 'new'
strategy). If we make it work like this, then we just need to add up the
time it would take to load up the data structure (and file_changes for the
'new' str
n, time factor or edit factor achieved a recall of 0.90 in the
tests that I ran.
Regards
Pablo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Pablo Estrada
wrote:
Hi Elena,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Elena Stepanova
wrote:
Hi Pablo,
Okay, thanks for the update.
As I understand, the last two gra
Hi Pablo,
Okay, thanks for the update.
As I understand, the last two graphs were for the new strategy taking
into account all edited files, no branch/platform, no time factor?
If it's not quite so, could you please indicate which exact
options/metrics did you use?
Also, if it's not too long
Hi Pablo,
On 23.07.2014 15:51, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hi Elena,
It's hard to make suggestions without seeing what you currently have,
please let me know when you have pushed the code.
I just finished cleaning up the code with the new implementation, but in
any case, the strategy is exactly th
Hi Pablo,
On 21.07.2014 19:28, Pablo Estrada wrote:
So having said that, I am looking for some advice in the following regards:
- I will also spend some time keeping a codebase that adjusts better to
the model that we need for the implementation. I will upload code soon. All
sugges
Hi Pablo,
On 17.07.2014 16:17, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hello Elena,
It took me a while to figure out how the files and the test_run s
correspond to each other, and there might still be some hard-to-solve
inconsistencies with them: There were a few cases where it is not easy to
determine -automatica
comment the header
of every function, but don't have too many in-line comments. You can let me
know if you need more clarifications.
Regards
Pablo
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Elena Stepanova
wrote:
Hi Pablo,
On 29.06.2014 6:25, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hi Elena and all,
I guess I sh
Hi Pablo,
The main goal of this task is developing an algorithm for test
selection. If you succeed at it but don't have time to create
interfaces, it should be very easy for us to fix it later. If, on the
other hand, you will end up with the complete system but without the
efficient enough al
, particularly that >90% recall ion shorter prediction periods.
That's why I'm still tuning and testing.
Again, all advice and observations are welcome.
Hope everyone is having a nice weekend.
Pablo
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Elena Stepanova
wrote:
Hi Pablo,
Could yo
Hi Pablo,
Could you please explain why you are considering the new results being
better? I don't see any obvious improvement.
As I understand from the defaults, previously you were running tests
with 2000 training rounds and 3000 simulation rounds, and you've already
had ~70% on 300 runs and
these tests using the time factor but not the test edit factor.
I will make the code changes and run the test on a bigger scale then.
I will take a serious look through the code to try to squeeze out as much
performance as possible as well : )
Regards
Pablo
On Jun 23, 2014 1:01 AM, "Elena St
atest version of the code, and here is a test run that
ran on this version of the code. It is quite different from the original
expectation; so I'm taking a close look at the code for bugs, and will run
another simulation ASAP (I'll use less data to make it faster).
On Thu, Jun 19, 2
Hi Pablo,
I'll send a more detailed reply later, just a couple of quick
comments/questions now.
To your question
I'm just not quite sure what you mean with this example:
mysql-test/plugin/example/mtr/t
In this example, what is the test name? And what is exactly the path?
(./mysql-test/...)
Hi Pablo,
One more note:
On 17.06.2014 12:16, Pablo Estrada wrote:
- Add randomized running of tests that have not ran or been modified - I
will make this optional.
I think it will be very useful for the *research* part if you make the
seed for this randomization deterministic for e
Hi Pablo,
On 17.06.2014 12:16, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Questions to consider:
- Should we define precisely what the implementation should look like,
so that I can code the core, wrapper, etc? Or should I focus on finishing
the experiments and the 'research' first?
I suggest to focus
Hi Sergei,
On 16.06.2014 13:46, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
And if lets say we decide that N=100 (or N=10%) is the best cutoff
value, and then find out that by not filling the queue completely we
lose even 1% in recall,we might want to stay with the full queue. What
is the time difference between r
Hi Sergei,
On 16.06.2014 10:57, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Elena!
Just one comment:
On Jun 16, Elena Stepanova wrote:
4. Failed tests vs executed tests
Further, as I understand you only calculate the metrics for tests which
were either edited, or failed at least once; and thus, only such
ll graph
them, and send them out in a couple hours.
Please at least fix the dependent logic first.
You should be able to see it easily by changing the order of modes in
run_basic_simulations -- e.g. try to run standard / platform / branch /
mixed for one running set, and then run again, with mixed
Hi Pablo,
Thanks for the update.
On 12.06.2014 19:13, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hello Sergei, Elena and all,
Today while working on the script, I found and fixed an issue:
There is some faulty code code in my script that is in charge of collecting
the statistics about whether a test failure was cau
Hi Pablo,
Thanks for the update. Some comments inline.
On 02.06.2014 18:44, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hello everyone,
Here's a small report on the news that I have so far:
1. I had a slow couple of weeks because of a quick holiday that I took.
I will make up for that.
2. I added the me
Hi Pablo,
Thanks for the update, it looks like a great start.
Please see some comments inline, and I suppose Sergei will provide his
own if he has something to add or correct. Most controversial points of
mine I marked as "ATTN Sergei:".
On 21.05.2014 8:06, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hello Sergei
Hi all,
Over the last couple of days, some of you have seen or even participated
in a "thread" on #maria IRC channel regarding the performance problem on
query execution that james_woods observed on MariaDB 10.0 instance
comparing to a Percona 5.5 instance. This email is for those who are
cur
Hi Pablo,
On 4/23/2014 12:07 PM, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hello Sergei,
Yup, I understand what you mean here... I can grasp the concepts, but I
am still having some trouble understanding some of the terms that you
use in the graphs. I can see that recall is related to the percentage of
failures t
Hi Pablo,
On 4/22/2014 10:14 AM, Pablo Estrada wrote:
Hello Sergei, Elena and everyone,
I'm Pablo, and I was selected as part of Google Summer of Code 2014 to
work on the project "*Statistically optimize mysql-test runs by running
less tests*". First of all, thank you very much for having select
Hi,
On 1/31/2014 11:49 AM, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
Elena Stepanova writes:
ifeq ($(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),)
# Don't know why the following is necessary...
cp unittest/unit.pl $(builddir)/unittest/
cp -r mysql-test/* $(builddir)/mysql
Hi all.
There is a fragment in MariaDB debian/dist/*/rules files:
...
ifeq ($(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),)
# Don't know why the following is necessary...
cp unittest/unit.pl $(builddir)/unittest/
cp -r mysql-test/* $(builddir)/mysql-test/
cp -r sql/s
Hi Christian,
On 12/8/2013 6:47 PM, Christian Convey wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm afraid I won't have the time available that I'd hope to, for
analyzing MariaDB with Coverity Prevent.
Would anyone like to take over from me the Coverity MariaDB account?
Yes, sure, please send me the details.
Thanks a
Hi Colin,
On 11/12/2013 4:45 PM, Colin Charles wrote:
Hi!
I see that we are shipping InnoDB from 5.6.5 (at least that's what the plugin
version tells me - 1.2.5). Are we going to pop XtraDB or a modern InnoDB into
10.0.6?
We are shipping 5.6.10, AFAIR the last '5' in the InnoDB version come
Hi,
On 10/19/2013 7:26 PM, Eric Bergen wrote:
I don't understand why you need both the xml style tag and
the double # to denote an explain entry. I would prefer to see each
line prefixed with # explain: to make it similar to the other info
lines above and get rid of the .
Regardless the tags
Hi,
On 8/23/2013 4:14 PM, Elena Stepanova wrote:
Hi,
On 8/23/2013 2:02 PM, Sergei Petrunia wrote:
Hello,
Igor has pointed out that the changelog for 10.0.4
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1004-release-notes/
has this line:
Partition lock pruning (MySQL Bug #37252, Bug #11748732
Hi,
On 8/23/2013 2:02 PM, Sergei Petrunia wrote:
Hello,
Igor has pointed out that the changelog for 10.0.4
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1004-release-notes/
has this line:
Partition lock pruning (MySQL Bug #37252, Bug #11748732)
while the feature doesn't seem to be there.
I did some
Hi,
On 8/14/2013 3:49 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi!
On Jul 10, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
In 5.5 we have ALTER ONLINE TABLE syntax, where ONLINE de facto means
"without copying the data".
Now, after 5.6 merge we also have ALGORITHM=COPY|INPLACE and
LOCK=NONE|SHARED|EXCLUSIVE.
I've mapped ONL
(warning: it's a long one)
Hi Sergei,
On 6/14/2013 6:26 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Elena!
On Jun 14, Elena Stepanova wrote:
On 6/14/2013 2:27 PM, Rasmus Johansson wrote:
Here is a suggested process to handle the ever growing amount of
minors. If a minor issue isn't fixed
Hi Kristian,
On 6/14/2013 5:39 PM, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
Rasmus Johansson writes:
This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
Please provide your thoughts. Do you think it's an OK way to deal with
the minors or do you
Hi,
On 6/14/2013 2:27 PM, Rasmus Johansson wrote:
Hi MariaDB Developers,
This is a suggestion on how to deal with minor or lower priority bugs
and tasks in JIRA, http://mariadb.org/jira .
Currently, the process we use makes a clear differentiation between
major or higher prioirty issues (calle
Hi,
On 5/9/2013 1:06 PM, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
"nanyi607rao" writes:
In
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/10.0-mdev452/revision/3434
you make some change to the class TC_LOG_MMAP,and I want to debug those
codes to see how it works.but i don't understand in what condi
Hi Gordan,
Could you please provide some more details in regard to
- which version of MySQL 5.6 you use,
- how you create the tables,
- how you archive the tables,
- what exactly happens when you put them on MariaDB -- does it fail to
start, or does it throw an error trying to read from the tabl
Hi Thomas,
The topmost reason for this kind of failure is usually an existing
my.cnf file which contains option(s) not supported by the current
version of the server, e.g. deprecated and removed. You mentioned that
you purged everything mysql-ish, did it include all instances of my.cnf
you co
Hi Rich,
MTR does have some hidden magic, but it's not _that_ smart... If you
just add a line source include/have_myengine.inc, it won't magically
load the engine myengine unless you take care about it.
What actually happens with have_XYZ.inc files is that they (and any
other inc files or te
Hi Rich,
Could you please file a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/maria, with
the description of the problem and [a link to] your patch?
I could do it on your behalf, but I suppose if the report belongs to
you, it will be more convenient for you to track the progress and for
others to request
Hi Sergei,
I've run a set of tests on the fix and they went uneventfully, but I've
also started the same set on the tree without the fix to make sure they
produce enough failures and thus are efficient enough to verify the fix.
/E
On 7/4/2012 2:39 PM, Sergei Petrunia wrote:
Hi Elena,
Coul
Hi Rich,
This looks like the problem described in
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=61575. The recommended solution was so
far to increase aio-max-nr on the host; but as you can see in the last
Monty's comment, in MariaDB it has now been fixed (by switching off
Linux Native AIO if we fail to i
ng to copy
over and modify test files. Currently it works for MyISAM, Aria, XtraDB,
Archive, InnoDB, Memory, Merge, CSV, Federated.
Regards,
Elena Stepanova
anyway, here are the failures:
Completed: Failed 37/323 tests, 88.54% were successful.
Failing test(s): engines/funcs
68 matches
Mail list logo
