GSoC (week 10)
1.solved the problem which was causing a crash for the optimized version.
2.modified some functions for renaming a column using alter table.
3.At first,the server crashed for queries like "select column_name from
table_name " if the column was present in the hash index. The probl
Hi, Sergey!
On Aug 03, Sergey Vojtovich wrote:
> revision-id: bdef42c54f8938d28d9a421271b11e09e88735a4
> (mariadb-5.5.50-19-gbdef42c)
> parent(s): 45ec5d673a1f5c736baec8ea9e2065bca4350324
> committer: Sergey Vojtovich
> timestamp: 2016-08-03 11:49:35 +0400
> message:
>
> MDEV-10365 - Race condit
Hi, Sergei!
On 03.08.2016 12:30, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Oleksandr!
Looks mostly ok, see few comments below
On Aug 01, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote:
revision-id: fc42991720838e165ad448b6707602cded92faa4
(mariadb-10.2.1-9-gfc42991)
parent(s): 08683a726773f8cdf16a4a3dfb3920e5f7842481
committer:
Hello Alexey,
Can you please review a patch for MDEV-10468?
Thanks!
diff --git a/mysql-test/r/func_group.result b/mysql-test/r/func_group.result
index ac076ec..ae16eb7 100644
--- a/mysql-test/r/func_group.result
+++ b/mysql-test/r/func_group.result
@@ -2270,3 +2270,15 @@ t2_id GROUP_CONCAT(IF (
On 3 Aug 2016, at 11:30, Mark Wadham wrote:
Our test case is a 3-node galera cluster on which we want to alter a
~160GB table that has .
Oops, that's 1347066922 rows.
Mark
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria
Hi, Oleksandr!
Looks mostly ok, see few comments below
On Aug 01, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote:
> revision-id: fc42991720838e165ad448b6707602cded92faa4
> (mariadb-10.2.1-9-gfc42991)
> parent(s): 08683a726773f8cdf16a4a3dfb3920e5f7842481
> committer: Oleksandr Byelkin
> timestamp: 2016-08-01 19:25:45 +
Hi,
Apologies if this is the wrong place to ask this question but it seemed
like the most apt.
We are working on operational processes for online schema changes with
MariaDB 10.1.16 and have encountered memory issues which are proving
difficult to reliably solve.
If anyone on this list cou
Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:54:16PM +0200, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
>
> Ok, see comments below.
>
> But why is this supposed to improve scalability?
> Are you talking about the use case of one table being access by multiple
> threads? Or this helps in other cases too?
Aim
8 matches
Mail list logo