Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:22:14PM +0200, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
>
> So, what did you do here? Did you change InnoDB's version of crc32 or
> just moved it to extra/ ?
Just moved it to extra, no changes to crc32-vpmsum code. Also let server
use it on PPC64LE.
>
> You re
Hi, Alexey!
Thanks! See below
On Jul 31, Alexey Botchkov wrote:
> revision-id: f89d1f55576136fb229392cb9a2997b9c0131241
> (mariadb-10.2.1-9-gf89d1f5)
> parent(s): 08683a726773f8cdf16a4a3dfb3920e5f7842481
> committer: Alexey Botchkov
> timestamp: 2016-07-31 14:04:52 +0400
> message:
>
> MDEV-104
Hi, Sergey!
So, what did you do here? Did you change InnoDB's version of crc32 or
just moved it to extra/ ?
You removed mysys/my_crc32.c - where will crc32 come from on x86?
Why did you name new function crc32_vpmsum instead of just naming it
crc32 and avoding #ifdef's elsewhere?
On Jul 05, Ser
Hi, Sergey!
Ok, see comments below.
But why is this supposed to improve scalability?
Are you talking about the use case of one table being access by multiple
threads? Or this helps in other cases too?
And what is the effect of the more expensive tc_remove_all_unused_tables() ?
On Jun 29, Sergey
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for the review. I would push the fix into 5.5 if there are no
buildbot failures. There seems to be something wrong with solaris though.
Need to #ifdef the __sync_synchronize() there. The patch generally applies
to 5.5 as well.
Since we're having a 5.5 week next, I'll test it for
Hi Vicentiu,
Ok to push. This patch is against 10.2, do you plan to fix previous versions
separately?
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:46:03PM +0300, vicentiu wrote:
> revision-id: 5486f3458859fa4bd161150b9ac0e9c0f633a0e3
> (mariadb-10.2.1-9-g5486f34)
> parent(s): 08683a726773f8cdf16a4a3dfb3920e5f7842
Hi, Sachin!
On Aug 02, Sachin Setia wrote:
> Hello Sergei!
>
> Sir I am stuck at one problem.
> Consider the case
> create table t1 (abc blob unique, xyz int unique);
> /* Insert data */
> update t1 set abc = 33 where xyz =23;
> This is not working because xyz = 23 will require index scan and at
7 matches
Mail list logo
