[Maria-developers] GSOC 2015: Indexes on virtual columns

Hello, My name is Lionel Sichom, 2nd year undergraduate student at the University of Buea. I am a newbie in Open source community and I am interested in participating at the Google Summer of Code 2015 with MariaDB. I am mostly interested with the project Indexes on virtual columns. As for now I

Re: [Maria-developers] [GSoC'15] Running MaxScale and MariaDB servers on single machine

That does look like a proper configuration of MaxScale. I hope this is just a small issue with your setup and that you will get it fixed. I'll take a closer look at the way the tutorial configures the servers. Markus On Mar 9, 2015 10:47 PM, "sriram patil" wrote: > Hi, > > I have set up the repl

Re: [Maria-developers] [GSoC'15] Running MaxScale and MariaDB servers on single machine

Hi, I have set up the replication. I have also confirmed that is works fine. The maxadmin also displays that there are two servers. But, Master ID = -1. Here's the output from maxadmin "show servers" Server 0x39c3520 (srv1) Server: localhost Status:

Re: [Maria-developers] [Maria-discuss] Enabling feedback pluging for MariaDB 10.1.4

Maybe make it an option when installing? On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Justin Swanhart wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with Kristian. Given the way it works, the statistics are really > meaningless and I feel you shouldn't drive important choices based on bad > statistics. I personally would sug

Re: [Maria-developers] [GSoC'15] Running MaxScale and MariaDB servers on single machine

Hi, Is the cluster set with replication? The readwritesplit needs at least one master and one slave to work. Using the maxadmin interface should verify this. The client binary can be found in the same folder as the maxscale binary. Default user name is admin and the password is skysql. Markus On

Re: [Maria-developers] [GSoC'15] Running MaxScale and MariaDB servers on single machine

Hi Markus, I got an error. It says "Error : No Master can be determined". Here's how my config file looks like [maxscale] threads=1 log_trace=1 [srv1] type=server address=localhost port=3306 protocol=MySQLBackend [srv2] type=server address=localhost port=3307 protocol=MySQLBackend [MariaDB10

Re: [Maria-developers] [GSoC'15] Running MaxScale and MariaDB servers on single machine

Hi, The first step would be to inspect the state the servers are in. The easiest way to do is to use the maxadmin interface. To enable this, configure the following into MaxScale's config file [CLI] type=service router=cli [CLI Listener] type=liste

Re: [Maria-developers] MariaDB Maxscale Project (GSOC 2015)

Hi, A good start would be to read up the MaxScale guide for compiling it from source: https://github.com/mariadb-corporation/MaxScale/blob/develop/Documentation/Getting-Started/Building-MaxScale-from-Source-Code.md Markus On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 19:48 +0530, Aalekh Nigam wrote: > Hello, > > I am

[Maria-developers] [GSoC'15] Running MaxScale and MariaDB servers on single machine

Hi All, I tried running 2 MariaDB servers and MaxScale on my laptop. I gave different configurations to both MariaDB servers with separate data and log directories. Referred this for it. Also have set up Ma

Re: [Maria-developers] [Maria-discuss] Enabling feedback pluging for MariaDB 10.1.4

Hi, I agree with Kristian. Given the way it works, the statistics are really meaningless and I feel you shouldn't drive important choices based on bad statistics. I personally would suggest displaying a link to a feedback/survey form with web downloads and display a message after rpm/deb install

[Maria-developers] MariaDB Maxscale Project (GSOC 2015)

Hello, I am Aalekh Nigam, 3rd year Undergraduate Student at JIIT, Noida. I have recently successfully completed Mozilla Winter Of Security and Owasp Winter of Code, and is aiming for MaxScale projects for this GSOC. Can someone please guide me through starter’s bug for Maxscale to get my hands o

Re: [Maria-developers] MDEV-7643 review

Hi, Elena! On Mar 09, Elena Stepanova wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2015-March/007508.html > > Could you please check patch for > https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-7643 (MTR creates nested links > when tests are run with --mem)? It's in the area th

[Maria-developers] Question regarding MDEV-7682

Hi Holyfoot! I've made some changes regarding key_length computation to fix MDEV-6838. Changing this seems to have lead to us discovering another issue outlined in MDEV-7682 (that I've just created). It seems that the spatial key returns a key_length of 0. I've spoken to Sergei Petrunia and we ar

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] e464bc6: MDEV-7107 Sporadic test failure in multi_source.multisource

ele...@montyprogram.com writes: > revision-id: e464bc6fe3d7566831da5e26447d90e758b5aa2a > committer: Elena Stepanova > timestamp: 2015-03-09 02:07:47 +0200 > message: > > MDEV-7107 Sporadic test failure in multi_source.multisource > > Extend show_slave_status.inc to run SHOW ALL SLAVES STATUS and

[Maria-developers] MDEV-7643 review

Hi Sergei, http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2015-March/007508.html Could you please check patch for https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-7643 (MTR creates nested links when tests are run with --mem)? It's in the area that you looked at recently, so you might think of something

[Maria-developers] MDEV-7107 review

Hi Kristian, Could you please take a quick look at the patch for MDEV-7107 (Sporadic test failure in multi_source.multisource). http://lists.askmonty.org/pipermail/commits/2015-March/007543.html I don't expect you'll mind changes to the test itself, we discussed earlier that's how SHOW SLAVE

Re: [Maria-developers] rpl test with gtid as default

Jean-François Gagné writes: > For me, classic negotiation must keep working, be supported and > actively developed (including adding crash safe replication). Well, it is not likely to go away. MariaDB GTID works very similar to old-style replication, and most of the code is shared. And a lot of

Re: [Maria-developers] rpl test with gtid as default

Jonas Oreland writes: > what do you think ? Interesting... It's nice that a number of tests pass by default with GTID. You used MASTER_USE_GTID=current_pos. This means that both replicated transactions and direct transactions on the server contribute to the GTID position. But for old-style rep

Re: [Maria-developers] [Maria-discuss] Enabling feedback pluging for MariaDB 10.1.4

Michael Widenius writes: > for the alpha so I suggested Sergei today that we should enable it for > the beta period of MariaDB 10.0 (10.*1* beta, I guess?) > As most MariaDB users should know, the feedback is totally anonymous > and no private or sensitive information is being sent. > > Any com

Re: [Maria-developers] a1c4620: MDEV-6858: enforce_storage_engine option

Hi, Jan! On Mar 08, Jan Lindström wrote: > revision-id: a1c4620646d43eaff979c132a57ee2101070fa5e > parent(s): 1b74f32b1d94465f6d6e14e4aa7ba1f94c32e39e > committer: Jan Lindström > branch nick: 10.1-innodb > timestamp: 2015-03-08 17:23:05 +0200 > message: > > MDEV-6858: enforce_storage_engine opti

[Maria-developers] Enabling feedback pluging for MariaDB 10.1.4

Hi! We had originally planned to enable the feedback plugin by default for the Alpha and Beta stages of MariaDB 10.1, but we forgot to do this for the alpha so I suggested Sergei today that we should enable it for the beta period of MariaDB 10.0 We agreed that before doing this we would have a di