[Maria-developers] MariaDB Galera 5.5.28a Release Prep

2012-12-21 Thread Daniel Bartholomew
All, looks like my first message on this never reached the list, so sending again. I've prepped the release notes and changelog pages for this release and will be activating it in a few hours (barring any show stoppers). - https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-galera-5528a-release-notes/ - https

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] Rev 3484: postreview fixes (part 5)

2012-12-21 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Sanja! On Dec 21, sa...@askmonty.org wrote: > At file:///home/bell/maria/bzr/work-maria-10.0-cassandra/ > > revno: 3484 > revision-id: sa...@askmonty.org-20121221010609-cnr2z3fg99kpxzma > committer: sa...@askmonty.org > branch nick:

[Maria-developers] Odd Error in Logs

2012-12-21 Thread Gordan Bobic
Hi, I recently switched from MySQL 5.6.5 to MariaDB 10.0, and I've been seeing errors like the following in the logs since: 121221 13:22:34 [ERROR] Master 'master1': Found index PRIMARY whose column info does not match that of MySQL. 121221 13:22:34 [ERROR] Master 'master1': Build InnoDB index

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] Rev 3482: post review changes - interface (part 3)

2012-12-21 Thread Georg Richter
Hi, > "madyncol" looks silly :) > let's agree on one namespace prefix and use it everywhere. either it's > ma_ like in > > ma_open > ma_dyncol_create_many > ma_alloc > > or it's maria_ like in > > maria_open > maria_dyncol_create_many > maria_alloc I think we should use the vendor pre

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] Rev 3482: post review changes - interface (part 3)

2012-12-21 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Sanja! On Dec 21, sa...@askmonty.org wrote: > At file:///home/bell/maria/bzr/work-maria-10.0-cassandra/ > > > revno: 3482 > revision-id: sa...@askmonty.org-20121220233538-b171yhb9isogvd5h > parent: sa...@askmonty.org-20121220204008-

Re: [Maria-developers] review of the MDEV-377 Name support for dynamic columns

2012-12-21 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Oleksandr! On Dec 21, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote: > It looks like you reviewed some old sources in 10.0-cassandra this is > fixed as we discussed it. I've reviewed the 5.5-cassandra tree. And yes, I thought that was already fixed, so I was a bit susprised to find it unfixed :) Ok, wrong tree,