Re: [Maria-developers] request for feedback on live schema changes patch

Hello all, I am hoping to resurrect this discussion. Has there been any discussion on implementing the feature of allowing handlers to do fast schema changes in MariaDB (on any version)? I have put this patch on MySQL 5.1, and I think I have it working. I started looking at MariaDB 5.2, but I do

Re: [Maria-developers] Windows installer MWL#55 finished.

From: Peter Laursen [mailto:peter_laur...@webyog.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 2. März 2011 11:30 To: Vladislav Vaintroub Cc: Kazuhisa Ichikawa; maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Maria-developers] Windows installer MWL#55 finished. It seems that

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] Rev 2934: Fix LP BUG#719198 in file:///home/tsk/mprog/src/5.3/

Hi Timour, On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 04:35:24PM +0200, tim...@askmonty.org wrote: > At file:///home/tsk/mprog/src/5.3/ > > > revno: 2934 > revision-id: tim...@askmonty.org-20110308143512-0m7uotvxp9rmegak > parent: pser...@askmonty.org-201

[Maria-developers] Review: Part 3 of 3 for MWL#90 combined patch for review

Hi! Here is the third and last part of the review. > "Sergey" == Sergey Petrunya writes: > @@ -7433,8 +7718,18 @@ > > table_map used_tables2= (join->const_table_map | > OUTER_REF_TABLE_BIT | RAND_TABLE_BIT); > - for (tab= join->join_tab+jo

Re: [Maria-developers] Report from OpenSourceDays2011

> That's it :-) Thanks for the update. It's good to read about what some of the core members are doing to evangelize in the community. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscri

[Maria-developers] Report from OpenSourceDays2011

Hi, On Saturday, March 5, I gave a talk at the OpenSourceDays 2011 conference in Copenhagen, Denmark: http://opensourcedays.org/ My talk was titled "Latest news from the MariaDB (and MySQL) community". I put the slides from the talk up on my web server here: http://knielsen-hq.org/maria

Re: [Maria-developers] Pbxt loses rows

Hi! > "Paul" == Paul McCullagh writes: Paul> I suspect that this is not due to rows being lost, but rather to the Paul> rows not being found for some timing reason. Paul> But, of course, only debugging will tell... Paul> We have scheduled time to look at this error. Any progress ? One