On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:25:22 +0200, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> How do you guys prefer to see patches on this - one big patch, or
> several smaller patches?
>From our experience doing this in Drizzle, smaller patches are better.
You will, inevitably, screw up somewhere. It's just the way things go.
Be
Hi, Bo!
On Aug 18, Bo Thorsen wrote:
>
> I'm working on getting rid of the compiler warnings on 64 bit Windows.
>
> There are literally thousands of places, where we store a size_t in an int,
> and the compiler warns about possible loss of data.
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to handle this in
I'm working on getting rid of the compiler warnings on 64 bit Windows.
There are literally thousands of places, where we store a size_t in an
int, and the compiler warns about possible loss of data.
I'm trying to figure out how to handle this in the best way, and I need
a bit of advice on how
Hi all,
I'm sending this patch again, since I didn't get any responses to the
last two mails.
The patch is almost identical to the last version except that I have
removed some parts of it - those warnings were fixed by someone else
after I sent the last version of the patch.
Here is the pa
Hi everyone,
I have updated the attached patch to apply to the 5.1 tree. Please see
the comments in my original mail below.
Any objections to apply this patch?
Original Meddelelse
Subject: Separate builddir from src dir with cmake
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:01:23 +0200
From:
5 matches
Mail list logo
