---
WORKLOG TASK
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
TASK...: Table elimination
CREATION DATE..: Sun, 10 May 2009, 19:57
SUPERVISOR.: Monty
IMPLEMENTOR..
---
WORKLOG TASK
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
TASK...: Table elimination
CREATION DATE..: Sun, 10 May 2009, 19:57
SUPERVISOR.: Monty
IMPLEMENTOR..
At file:///home/psergey/dev/maria-5.3-subqueries-r10/
revno: 2785
revision-id: pser...@askmonty.org-20100323145750-sr9oucry979i3p60
parent: pser...@askmonty.org-20100321200604-oxw7ri2qu5c9n7gy
committer: Sergey Petrunya
branch nick: mar
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:03:34 +0200, Henrik Ingo
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
>>> At least the application of replicated transactions certainly should
>>> not be part of each storage engine. From the engine point of view,
>>> applying a set of replicated transactions should b
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:12:53 +0200, Henrik Ingo
wrote:
> Meta discussion first, replication discussion below :-)
I guess we can consider meta-discussion closed for now unless someone
wants to add to it. I'm content ;)
>>
>>> So those are the requirements I could derive from having NDB use our
>
On 23.03.2010, at 09:10, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Kristian Nielsen writes:
>
>>> I know how to take an external project and merge it into MariaDB. This uses
>>> the "merge-into" bzr plugin.
>>>
>>> However, I do not know how to go in the opposite direction, that is take a
>>> part od the Mari
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
>> At least the application of replicated transactions certainly should
>> not be part of each storage engine. From the engine point of view,
>> applying a set of replicated transactions should be "just another
>> transaction". For the engine it should not
Quoting Henrik Ingo :
Meta discussion first, replication discussion below :-)
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Yurchenko
wrote:
Uh, I'm not sure I can accept this proposition. At least it seems
contradictory to MariaDB's vision of being a practical, user and
customer driven, database.
Meta discussion first, replication discussion below :-)
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Yurchenko
wrote:
>> Uh, I'm not sure I can accept this proposition. At least it seems
>> contradictory to MariaDB's vision of being a practical, user and
>> customer driven, database.
>
> I do understand
Kristian Nielsen writes:
>> I know how to take an external project and merge it into MariaDB. This uses
>> the "merge-into" bzr plugin.
>>
>> However, I do not know how to go in the opposite direction, that is take a
>> part od the MariaDB tree and split it out in a separate project, and still
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo