On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
>
> MARK> This includes results from sysbench for Maria 5.2 with/without
> MARK> userstat enabled and for several other binaries. The results are
> MARK> throughput (transactions per second)
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> This includes results from sysbench for Maria 5.2 with/without
MARK> userstat enabled and for several other binaries. The results are
MARK> throughput (transactions per second) for 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 concurrent
MARK> sessions.
MARK>
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> Pardon my manual cut & paste, gmail didn't format the reply cleanly:
No problems
MARK> Thanks for cleaning this up.
MARK> The original implementations of SHOW USER_STATS and SHOW TABLE_STATS
MARK> had performance problems. SHOW TABLE_STATS w
This includes results from sysbench for Maria 5.2 with/without
userstat enabled and for several other binaries. The results are
throughput (transactions per second) for 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 concurrent
sessions.
This tests many binaries including 5.0.37 with the v2 Google patch (aka 503
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> I am willing to bet that Monty's patch makes sysbench readonly much
MARK> slower with high concurrency on an 8-core server. But those problems
MARK> have been fixed in recent versions of the patch.
>>
>> One should note that I changed the patc
Hi!
> "Sergei" == Sergei Golubchik writes:
Sergei> Hi, Monty!
Sergei> On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats patch
>> to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
Sergei> I wonder if anybody cares to monitor mutex usage
6 matches
Mail list logo
