Hi,
I installed a new instance of my e-mail platform for a customer of my
company but a very strange things happens during the warm up of the new
sending IPs.
Quite all the IPs (Assigned us directly from the RIPE) got a sender
score of 0 instead of the usual 96 -> 98 range.
Fortunately, few of
*From:*mailop *On Behalf Of *Support
3Hound via mailop
*Sent:* Thursday, July 18, 2019 7:30 AM
*To:* mailop@mailop.org
*Subject:* [mailop] Crazy Sender-score value of 0 instead of 96-98
Hi,
I installed a new instance of my e-mail platform for a customer of my
company but a very strange thing
Hi Michael,
in past experiences I saw a lot of time similar messages even on new IP
address just installed.
I don't know exactly the meaning of S3150 but the message generally
means that the IP has been temporary blocked (you can check it on SNDS
on IP status section).
It should happens when th
Dear list,
I would like to understand what the community think about the new
Validity universal feedback loop service that is switching to a paid
service starting 21 September 2023.
As Validity worked in the the last years to achieve the management of
the FBL service from all the "main" count
I agree with you Neil,
let me specify it better even if it's a bit off topic.
The FBL SHOULD NOT be used like that but this is how users act based on
the feedback we collected from end users when we tried to understand why
we was receiving so much FBL on double-optin collected lists and
transac
As in the Subject, I'm trying to contact that postmaster.
Note:
I cannot reach him/her using postmaster@ nor the contact form of the
registrar. I don't find any other valid contact way.
We should deliver regularly some important transactional e-mail (about 2
messages every day) to domains hos
Il 26/02/2024 16:19, Kris Deugau via mailop ha scritto:
Try postmas...@tucows.com, hostedemail.com is Tucows' hosted email
service.
Thank you Kris, I'm going to try.
Also try getting your recipients to complain to their mail hosting
provider - complaints from the people who want to *receiv
The issue has been solved.
I'm not sure if someone read my first e-mail and silently operates to
verify/solve without reply (google style) or if it's a natural update
over a false positive or even if the recipient comply with them as a
customer.
I would like just to puntualize I'm not sure I
Opposite experience also for me.
Working in the past for an ESP (that was both SuretyMail and CSA
certified) I received some complaints from CSA.
The complaint process asks also to demonstrate that the data was
correctly collected (site, timestamps, IP, privacy statement accepted,
privacy flag
Never seen before but...
today we got blacklisted some (never used to send e-mail before) IP
address (only from megarbl.net)
Is it a false positive?
Someone other got this nonsense listing?
Thanks
Stefano
Il 25/11/2019 14:25, Emre Üst via mailop ha scritto:
Hello everyone ,
Is anybody know
Hi Paul,
some years ago, I got the same issue when the company changed
datacenter/IPs space after a period where both feed/ip space was used.
I don't remember some details but I solved reactivating the access for a
part of the OLD IPs (the part that has been removed) so I got back
access to th
Hi All,
we are also having false positive with CSS on any sending IP in our
212.115.97.0/24 since we re-start mailing after we stopped Christmas
Holidays.
I opened a CSS ticket having replies (and re-listing) every 3-4 days.
The "issue" identified every time differs:
-"message characteristics i
Hi Jeff,
as the FBL bring back to you (usually in ARF format) every reporting
user/mail, I suggest you to "link" the FBL address to an automatic ARF
parser that permanently unsubscribe users (maybe following the "one
click unsubscribe" header) and give back you a feedback report in order
to pr
About 15 years ago they was sending NDR for each non existing user,
including very old abandoned mailbox called "soft spamtrap", and also
for something like "unsubscribe from this list" or "block this sender".
I was managing a mailing platform and we was forcing unsubscribing for
all permanent N
Dear list,
is it fair/correct to check the existence of a mailbox for about 30/50
mail addresses/day?
They quite always will be present unless misspelled or typo that may be
a couple in a month.
We must RSET and then QUIT every the smtp connection just after the RCPT
TO answer because we must c
First: thank you all for the answers.
It's clear that's very bumpy road, someone doesn't care about few checks
a day and it's ok some other take it as a bad practice, some other block
the IP so there's no way to have an overall view. A lot of provider
blocks the VRFY command so that's not an op
not accepted and blocked by many operator.
Ok, message received!
But remember we are not trying to spam, spoof or fraud anyone.
Thank you all,
Have nice weekend ;-)
Il 27/06/2025 06:36, Jay Hennigan via mailop ha scritto:
On 6/26/25 10:49, Support 3Hound via mailop wrote:
Our customer is
17 matches
Mail list logo
