Re: [mailop] CBL & c_sludge

My understanding is that this may have been a misfiring heuristic and that it’s been suppressed pending further investigation. Thank you for asking your question. All the best Simon > On 7 Jul 2017, at 14:37, Kirk MacDonald > wrote: > > Struggling a bit to understand a development this mor

Re: [mailop] Properly vetting an hosting provider before buying/moving

> On 17 Jul 2017, at 13:28, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > Senderscore, > senderbase, uce-protect, spamhaus, spamcop and other sources are not > publishing informations that declare OVH worse than others direct > competitor in EU.

Re: [mailop] btinternet.com blacklist

> On 17 Jul 2017, at 14:44, Hetzner Blacklist wrote: > > I’ve been in contact with a number of people this past year and many of > them have acknowledged that our network no longer deserves a bad > reputation. However, I can fully understand that not everybody will > agree, and I believe there a

Re: [mailop] Properly vetting an hosting provider before buying/moving

> On 17 Jul 2017, at 16:59, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > On 17 July 2017 at 16:57, Simon Forster <mailto:simon-li...@ldml.com>> wrote: >> >> On 17 Jul 2017, at 13:28, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> >> Senderscore, >> senderbase, uce-protect, spamhaus,

Re: [mailop] SpamHaus blocking our DNS queries

> On 19 Oct 2018, at 03:41, gustavo wrote: > > > Hi > We have a low-traffic email server, receiving around 800 emails/day and > sending about the same > number of emails/day. >

Re: [mailop] Anybody from spamhaus i can reach off list

Use the normal channel. Go to >, look up property and follow instructions. All the best Simon > On 5 Apr 2019, at 11:01, Jan Schapmans wrote: > > Dear, > > we experienced problems with one of our PTR domains on our CSA ips

Re: [mailop] "Spammer TLDs" and IP addresses without a reverse?

  On 21 April 2016 at 09:43:53, Paul Smith (p...@pscs.co.uk(mailto:p...@pscs.co.uk)) wrote: > It would be great if limited information was available without rate > limiting - eg registration date and registrar ID and possibly a > data-quality indicator. That would help a lot with spam reductio

Re: [mailop] automated looking mailchimp opt-ins (confused by)

th abuse. It would be interesting to see if it’s of any use combatting this latest maliciousness. If anyone would like to test, contact me off list and we’ll get you free access for six months to give it a go. Simon Forster Spamhaus Technology Ltd London, UK https://www.spamhaust

Re: [mailop] How many more RBL's do we really need?

> On 29 Aug 2016, at 14:45, Bryan Vest wrote: > > This may have been brought up before and if there is already a group please > point me to it, but we need a study group/governing body/RFC to at least put > out suggestions on RBL structure. RFC 6471 - Overview of Best Email DNS-Based List (DN

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus and Spamcop Blacklisting

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 11:56, Rupesh Gohil wrote: > > Hi > > What is the process of Spamhaus and Spamcop delisting? For Spamhaus, it’s quite simple. Go to >, find the listed property and follow the instructions for removal. I

Re: [mailop] Malware hosted @ Mailchimp

> 52.85.245.136/32 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List - SBL 2017-04-03 05:11:52 GMT | amazon.com Malware distribution @52.85.245.136 A website at this IP address is currently being (ab)used by cybercrim

Re: [mailop] Invalument SIP/24

> On 27 Jun 2019, at 09:17, Dave Holmes via mailop wrote: > > All email is GDPR EU compliant What the heck does that mean? And why should any provider of realtime blocklists care whether the spam being sent out by a network is compliant with some legislation — or not? Providers of “threat

Re: [mailop] Any URI whitelists out there?

> On 11 Jul 2019, at 05:47, Benoit Panizzon via mailop > wrote: > > We operate the SWNIOG Blacklists and Spamtraps. > > We fairly often find URI which make it onto the blacklist, which should > clearly be whitelisted. Like 'apple.com' just this week. > > We do maintain a whitelist, but I sta