Hi Kurt,
At 05:25 21-05-2017, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Can you tell more about this ? Why is '-all' bad ?
You are assuming that when the message is delivered to the receiver,
it will see a connection from the sending IP address.
Re
what will happen because of their policies.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
end where DKIM
verification failed and compare it to the message which was sent out?
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
RFC-correct way to do
it. We could probably get them to make an exception here, but I'm
curious if there is any real world impact to that.
The "Return-path" header is appended at the message delivery
stage. The is a discussion of autoresponder in RFC 3834.
with a mailbox name is returned. Sometimes, the "text" is
used to convey some unstructured information which might be useful to
the other end.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
(
https://forums.att.com/t5/AT-T-Internet-Email-Security/ATT-outgoing-email-is-being-blocked-by-spam-filter/m-p/5199721
).
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
st
(SMTP) reply code for what the MSA is trying to communicate to the MUA [1].
Regards,
-sm
1. I assume that you meant "MAIL FROM"
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com]"
Would it be possible to have the IP address mitigated [1] as it is
not used for sending "unwanted" emails?
Regards,
-sm
1. I'll provide a ticket number if it that would be useful.
x27;t any complaint.
Did you substantially increase sending volume?
No, the sending volume to hotmail.com is very low.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Hi Michael,
At 12:47 PM 26-10-2017, Michael Wise wrote:
Ticket numbers are ALWAYS helpful... even if not for me.
The ticket number is SRX1402095036ID
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin
oes not sound like a good idea. Why
would the receiver's implementation require segmented delivery?
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
clude Asian and Cyrillic characters.
I know there's an RFC from 2012, but my Product
Dev people are interested in knowing how wide-spread the actual adoption is.
There was a report about it:
https://cnnic.com.cn/IC/Events/201511/t20151110_53004.htm
Re
track document I know of touching this
topic for SMTP/MX is RFC 7672 for DANE, and for the DANE case, Exim
always sends SNI.
There is some information in RFC 6125.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cg
Hi Paul,
At 03:40 AM 25-05-2018, Paul Smith wrote:
I wish that was the case, but it's not what GDPR says, certainly for
SMTP relay services
The organization running the service would be the "processor". Did
you ask the ICO whether there is any guidance for a SMTP service?
Hi Rob,
At 01:08 PM 06-06-2018, Rob McEwen wrote:
Here is an article I posted on Linkedin about spam filtering IPv6-sent email.
"Should mail servers publish IPv6 MX records? Could this harm your
spam filtering?"
In other words, DNSBLs have a scalability problem.
Re
Hi Benoit,
At 12:29 AM 13-12-2018, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
So based on my observation I wonder...
Upon receiving a 452 4.5.3 error, what should the sending MTA do?
Reconnect immediately and re-try the soft failed recipients as would
be done with the usual 'too many recipients' situation? Or is it
around no-reply addresses.
The "Auto-Submitted" header field might help (RFC 3834) to avoid a
loop. I guess that nore...@example.com is intended to inform the
person reading the email that he/she should not reply to it.
Regards,
-sm
__
ule above applies only if there are no
MX records present'
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ink", e.g. output sink.
ADMD, Administrative Management Domain. The document dances around
the term. However, it is never explicitly defined.
I suggest viewing ADMDs in terms of administrative
boundaries. Section 2.3, Paragraph 2 discusses about that.
Regards,
-sm
___
nded to add a "Message-ID" field if there isn't one in a
message. There are reasons why that is not always done. You did
your part; that's good enough.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
bout edge cases.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
drop me an email if that does not work.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
essage is just sitting in a queue instead of
delivering or bouncing?" It depends on whether the sender is
monitoring the logs or getting complaints from his/her users. The
complaints might come in faster when there is a rejection.
Regards,
-sm
_
goodmail with a now busted signature.
The issue with removing a DKIM signature which would get broken is
that it is not easy to reverse the removal in future. It is better
[1] to treat the "broken" DKIM signature as unsigned.
Regards,
-sm
1. This depends on the receivers you
:
;test.live.com. IN TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
test.live.com. 3600IN CNAME rds.live.com.nsatc.net.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5617 says that the status of ADSP
is "Historic".
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop ma
gards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
does not
permit messages to be sent through Office365.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
because of delivery issues. I also use "DELIVERBY" for some messages.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Hello,
At 05:23 AM 18-08-2020, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
I am receiving emails from Sendgrid about "Nedbank Credit Card
monthly Charges eStatement". The account is 17343945. It looks like
a phishing attempt. Those emails or
configuration setting tells OpenDKIM to reject the message.
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
onsequently as consistently the iOS Mail
App sends its empty body emails with two 0x0a's.
So my question reads: Is this behaviour a fault? Not a fault as
within the specs? indifferent, so not to be decided?
Looking at the raw message might provide a better view of wh
ueueing tweaks on the MTA end. One of
the goals was to be able to answer questions such as "was the email
delivered to X?" The information was accessible through a web interface.
The usual mail servers should be able to send 100,000 messages daily.
Regards,
-sm
_
The underscore convention is used for underscored node names. It's
not uncommon (RFC 8552, Section 4.1.2, has a list of entries).
Regards,
-sm
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
33 matches
Mail list logo
