On 3/13/2024 at 12:55, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Has anyone checked what traffic is still using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 ?
Yes, some infected machines from DZ, BR, AR, ID and so :-)
I checked last 90 days log now, i found only small number of plain
text deliveries to me, but no one legitimate host wi
On 3/15/2024 at 10:35, Chris Adams via mailop wrote:
Linode/Akamai has $5/month VMs that include a /64. So that's not a
good excuse either.
This. And Linode actually has an effective abuse desk.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https:/
Seeing this type of stuff quite a lot originating from legitimate
Microsoft infrastructure, and their abuse desk never seems to take any
action; I suppose dropping any *.onmicrosoft.com envelope-from is
probably the right course of action here?
From: Makita 6-pc Combo Kit Department
---
On the topic of free services that Google provides (with no support or
abuse contact whatsoever), has anyone else noticed an uptick in Google
Groups spam lately?
I'm wondering what SpamAssassin rule to boost, but it seems like this
operator has mostly covered their bases? KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ migh
On 8/28/2024 at 07:27, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
We have seen an increase of spam and phishing emails from Google
Groups since 21.08. It seems the spammers are adding large amounts
of collected addresses to groups and then sending their spam messages
to the group address. While the spam
On 8/28/2024 at 08:08, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
Well, entirely for everyone who is not using Google Groups himself. If you have a small
user base this might be actually "everyone".
You can use the header X-Google-Group-Id. I have so far not seen any other
emails from Gmail or Gsuite wh
On 8/28/2024 at 13:48, Mark E. Mallett via mailop wrote:
I'm on (I think) 7 such lists. At least one of them (beancount) is quite
active. Only one (redo, a build system) is getting flooded with spam,
and that just recently.
FWIW, these are *new* Google Groups lists, expressly created for SPAM:
On 10/14/2024 at 05:31, Paul Menzel via mailop wrote:
Since at least September 17th, 2024, we receive a lot of unsolicited
messages from SendGrid. I forwarded five to ab...@sendgrid.net, but
there was no reply and the problem persists. Today at least five
messages from xvfrkpcc.outbound-mail.se
On 10/14/2024 at 07:17, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
They simply ignore mails to that address. It is a company that at least
tolerates spammers using their services.
I recommend rejecting all mail from them.
The problem is convincing Sendgrid's customers - like Aegean S.A. - to
quit and inso
On 10/27/2024 at 13:47, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
Or intentionally sabotage the IMAP experience, because it's a really bad
experience with this behavior.
I'm pretty sure it's this; along the same lines as Microsoft barring
GSSAPI auth against IMAP targets from Outlook (while allowing the sam
Interesting; is there a straightforward way to drop that traffic entirely?
I think the HRDP IPs and hostnames are probably indistinguishable for
folks outside of the Microsoft ecosystem, and
"OutboundIpPoolName=HighRiskOutboundPool" is some tenant-viewable
internal marker that's not actually
I've been reporting these to Microsoft (ab...@microsoft.com,
ab...@outlook.com, j...@office365.microsoft.com), but I don't think they
grok what's going on:
---
Hi,
Based on the information you provided, it appears to have originated
from an Office 365 or Exchange Online tenant account.
To r
On 2/20/2025 at 09:31, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
Are you forwarding the messages, or including full messages as attachments
as their instructions say? (I think this is wholly unreasonable, but it
is what they say, and I am very mildly curious as to whether it makes a
difference if you do
On 2/19/2025 at 23:19, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
However, j...@office365.microsoft.com seems to be a black hole. There
are no responses, and apparently no action to stop the spam (at least
not within my attention span which is a number of days but not weeks).
Is there any human ther
No, Ironports will use whatever DNS servers you specify.
Also, I don't believe it's typical to employ third-party RBLs with
Ironports; Cisco's SBRS is pretty good alone, IMO.
Scott Q: not sure if you're aware, but there's a very coarse reputation
check you can do here for your sending IP:
ministry in a foreign government. Their volume is so low it doesn't
register anywhere so it's probably some extreme configuration Pfanner
did to block unknown domains or something.
Scott
On Thursday, 15/05/2025 at 08:36 Robert Giles via mailop wrote:
No, Ironports will use
16 matches
Mail list logo
