Re: [mailop] Restricted email address UIDs for public email domains

2017-07-26 Thread Peter Bowen
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Kirk MacDonald wrote: > In addition to what is mentioned in RFC2142, can anyone offer any resources > (or "best practices") for what can be considered "restricted" email > addresses/UIDs for a domain which offers mailbox service to the general > public? This wou

[mailop] Non-RSA DKIM

2016-06-14 Thread Peter Bowen
RFC 6736 only defines rsa-sha1 and rsa-sha256 for DKIM. It says "Other algorithms MAY be defined in the future. Verifiers MUST ignore any signatures using algorithms that they do not implement." I was wondering if anyone has implemented any other algorithms, notably anything using elliptic curve

Re: [mailop] why "not comply with best practices" on SpamRats?

2016-06-14 Thread Peter Bowen
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian > wrote: >> >> 163 is an email provider that I doubt provides dynamic IP space of any sort. >> And as Junping says, 700 million mailboxes. Well north of 30 million, like >> I said :)