Re: [mailop] is warming IPs still necessary?

2024-03-26 Thread Niels Dettenbach via mailop
Am Dienstag, 26. März 2024, 10:21:23 CET schrieb Laura Atkins via mailop: > Don’t use EC2 for mail. Use SES. yes, but by my experience, AWS today has a overall poor reputation within the internet email sphere. just my .02$ niels. -- --- Niels Dettenbach Syndicat IT & Internet https://www.

Re: [mailop] Are there other comparable services like spamcop.net / spamhaus.org?

2024-04-03 Thread Niels Dettenbach via mailop
Am Mittwoch, 3. April 2024, 10:41:01 CEST schrieb Aban Dokht via mailop: > Currently we are reporting SPAM samples semi automated to those to services > and would like to know, if the are other ones worth to contribute so. even if they work different then spamhaus (which is a DNSBL operator) - we

Re: [mailop] Off-Topic - VMWare ESXI 7.0

2024-04-17 Thread Niels Dettenbach via mailop
Am Dienstag, 16. April 2024, 14:15:17 CEST schrieb Raymond Burkholder via mailop: > > Similar products are Microsoft Hyper-V, Oracle Linux Virtualization > > Manager (OLVM), Proxmox and Nutanix. Each one of these products has > > some shortcommings compared to VMware. If you don't need a GUI to >

Re: [mailop] SORBS Closing.

2024-06-05 Thread Niels Dettenbach via mailop
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2024, 05:00:31 CEST schrieb Marco Moock via mailop: > Is there a reason that this is not mentioned on the homepage? It is curious to see / read nothing about a/that closure over the SORBS project primary / "official" website... Is there some official note to expect? cheers,

Re: [mailop] addressing a mail server running in virtual space

2024-11-20 Thread Niels Dettenbach via mailop
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2024, 20:31:37 schrieb Marco Moock via mailop: > server that is accessible by a public IPv4 and IPv6 address. > > If you don't have that, people can't reach you. > > Of course, you can use NAT with static rules, if you need/want. > > The MX includes a hostname and this

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-02-03 Thread Niels Dettenbach via mailop
Am Freitag, 31. Januar 2025, 01:41:58 schrieb Matt Palmer via mailop: > The title of RFC7505 is "A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for > Domains That ***Accept No Mail***" (emphasis added). Assuming that a > domain that contains a null MX record will not send mail seems doomed to > false pos