[mailop] Samsung and SIZE

2024-01-13 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
I happened to see Samsung's email app send a SIZE parameter (rfc1870) to MAIL command without the capability being advertised. I wonder if this is a known thing, it's a difficult question to google. For me anyway. I don't know details about phone or app versions, other than that it's probably rec

Re: [mailop] (Mis)use of DKIM's length tag and it's impact on DMARC and BIMI

2024-05-17 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 02:11:04PM -0700, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > I guess the part that's new to me is the apparent widespread (enough) use > of the l= > parameter. I don't recall ever noticing its use before, though can't say > it was ever top > of mind when looking at various headers of

Re: [mailop] Mailserver software

2024-07-15 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > Am 15.07.2024 um 22:39:34 Uhr schrieb Jeff Pang via mailop: > > > When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail. > > At least when visiting the website, qmail's last release is more than > 25 years ago.

Re: [mailop] Mailserver software

2024-07-15 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:04:09PM -0500, Chris Adams via mailop wrote: > I ran sendmail for many years, got my release notes entries to show for > it. :) It was kind of neat to be able to do wacky things with what was > essentially a programming language config, but now I think there's > better w

Re: [mailop] Uptick in Google Groups spam?

2024-08-28 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 07:46:36AM -0500, Robert Giles via mailop wrote: > So dropping Google Groups entirely: since Google's infrastructure is > "unblockable", I'd suspect keying on a Google Groups-specific header, but > how are you (and other folks) accomplishing this? As somebody else mention

Re: [mailop] Uptick in Google Groups spam?

2024-08-31 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:54:27PM +0200, Ángel via mailop wrote: > On 2024-08-28 at 14:48 -0400, Mark E. Mallett via mailop wrote: > > PS: I was just looking at the archive hosted at googlegroups on a > > couple of them, and I notice that the "show original" item o

Re: [mailop] SPF alignment when sending from G Suite

2024-10-11 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 04:20:23PM +, Dave Crocker via mailop wrote: > On 10/11/2024 12:49 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote: > > Yes, SPF has drawbacks.  But it is still trivial to implement and makes > > DMARC easier to implement as well. > > > Actually it isn't. That was my init

Re: [mailop] DKIM: Who's using the x tag?

2024-10-10 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 05:47:43PM -0500, Al Iverson via mailop wrote: > I love the idea of the X tag with DKIM to set an expiration date after > which the signature should no longer be considered valid. (As > described here, and many other places: https://xnnd.com/dqio ). But > who actually has im

Re: [mailop] SPF alignment when sending from G Suite

2024-10-14 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 04:56:16PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett via mailop wrote: > That was my initial reaction(*) too, about "trivial to implement." "Implement" can mean "deploy" or it can mean "write code to process" (more or less). At the start of this

Re: [mailop] gmail dkim oddity

2025-04-09 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 12:03:18PM -0700, Wei Chuang via mailop wrote: > Hi Julian, > I work in Gmail. There's a bug in our implementation for "Show Original" > for "Alignment" and it's being rolled back and fixed. For now ignore that > comment around "Alignment". Oh that's kind of interesting.

Re: [mailop] [ADMIN] list breakage

2025-03-04 Thread Mark E. Mallett via mailop
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 04:49:52PM +, Graeme Fowler via mailop wrote: > All > > Somewhat embarrassingly, we’ve been tripped up by a DNSBL that’s shut down > recently. Messages sent since Feb 20th have reached mailman, been archived > correctly, but then failed to send out due to a misconfigu