Hi Michael,
we also have a similar case ( SRX1402507373ID )
We acted like you suggested many times, the subnet also doesn't show any
problems in SNDS and there were no JMRP mails.
nevertheless, the robot didn't mitigate the issue and our manual
response didn't trigger any action from "your" side
oftCorporation| Spam Analysis
>
> "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
>
> Got the Junk Mail Reporting
> Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275>?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Ziegler [mailto:m...@
Hello,
add me to the list of people searching for a proofpoint contact...
we filled out their delisting form three times over the last two months
and got no reply whatsoever. the IP stays listed ofc...
Regards
Andreas
Vytis Marčiulionis schrieb am 26.11.18 um 13:20:
> Hello,
>
> We have an o
Hi,
a user of my server complained, that some of his mails don't reach mail
accounts from hotmail/live/outlook etc. that complaint is nothing new,
the problem exists for months now.
the users mails are dkim signed, the domain has DKIM and SPF TXT DNS
records, since yesterday there is also a DMARC
supression and is
illegal (§206 StGB).
Best Regards
Andreas
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails
Von: Michael Wise
An: Andreas Ziegler , mailop@mailop.org
Datum: 9.6.2016, 04:08:39
>
> At the request of the customer-base, traffic t
I very much appreciate you, Michael, taking part in the discussions on
this list and giving us some hints on what the issues are.
Microsoft could (unfortunately) easily ignore every inquiry from small
mail providers and it won't affect them, so... thanks for not ignoring ;-)
My hint to german law
Hi Michael,
thanks for your thoughts on this.
But you said nothing about the issue with non-bulk messages that are
marked as spam... THAT is the real problem in my opinion - or are your
algorithms really good enough to filter that out, so it won't affect an
IPs/Domains reputation?
Maybe a commen
not only microsoft-related, a suggestion to those managing more than one
server:
use only one of them to send out the mail and use it as a relay for the
others.
from my experience this leads to better results, even if there are
hacked accounts from time to time - the big providers seem to be OK wit
John Levine schrieb am 09.02.2017 um 05:30:
> If you want your mail delivered, you have to filter out the spam, even
> if it's forwarded.
sure - i didn't say i don't do that.
maybe i should simply set stricter rules for forwards than for local
mailboxes...
__
John Levine schrieb am 13.02.2017 um 17:52:
> Your server is in 176.9/16. On my network, I've blocked all mail from
> that /16 formany years, with never a user complaint. If the mail logs
> are a guide, Hetzner's customers consist entirely of dusty botted web
> servers.
really brave.
we have m
Sorry, but this strategy looks more like some hobbyist hosting the
server for himself and his friends.
Some of the TLDs you simply block are used by people i know for
legitimate purposes, let alone by all the people i don't know.
Scoring messages by the TLD, ok, i do that, too - but an immedi
Atro and everyone else blaming Hetzner for their abuse handling:
what is your data that shows hetzner being worse than others in this field?
does this data put in relation the size of the provider (number of
IPs/servers/customers) ?
hetzner has grown big and in absolute numbers it's clear that
uceprotect is (or was?) quite common around german municipalities and
other governement agencies.
maybe some appliance they are/were using included this list by default?
Regards
Andreas
Slavko via mailop wrote on 14.05.23 12:47:
Hi,
i read multiple times, from multiple sources about UCEPROT
13 matches
Mail list logo
