Hellow Michael,
On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 09:08 -0800, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> X-Gm-Message-State:
> AOJu0Yygtd3O5YdS/rWj45vxya0hwrYa/BjQf5JxGSCWzAx9RXR9bryH
> LpU0oZbfEz95pt1aYhcAMT1+ArGYrI6GtRLuJdtIEEHgVc36TLiys7kql09B
> 4icWlFB6/0HAW7R
> L84tjrA==
> X-Google-Smtp-Source:
Hellow Kai,
On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 16:26 +0100, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
> Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
>
> > We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
> > implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
>
> Skip SRS and implement ARC for f
Hellow Matus,
On Sun, 2024-02-04 at 16:02 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
wrote:
> > Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
> > > We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether
> > > to
> > > implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
>
> On 02.02
Hellow Jarland,
2-07 at 20:51 -0600, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> (...)
> Is it time to throw in the towel on email forwarding? Nearly 100% of
> users who forward email do so because they want it in Gmail. (...)
How about this?
https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/stuff/-/raw/7a68692f2a6f7c5b03f7a
Good morning everyone,
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 13:37 +0900, Byunghee HWANG (황병희) via mailop
wrote:
> Hellow Jarland,
>
> 2-07 at 20:51 -0600, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
> > (...)
> > Is it time to throw in the towel on email forwarding? Nearly 100%
> > of
> &
Hellow Slavko,
> If we will not change something, we will waste more power
> in fighting, than for providing service. And IMO providing
> service have to be goal...
I really strongly agree with this opinion. That's why I wish people in
the world didn't use SPF. SPF is a serious obstacle when forw
Hellow Benny,
> spf is not designed for forwarding, stop forwarding, problem solved
Yes, you are right!
And if Google stops email service, i will also stop forwarding.
Sincerely, Byunghee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
Hellow Benny,
> (...) please be open minded, you already is using opensource
Thanks, usually i don't say 'No' to someone i like. In any case. I'm
going to try your advice someday.
Thanks again Benny!
Sincerely, Byunghee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
Hellow Cyril,
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 11:06 +0100, Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
> That's a good argument. I can do even better:
>
> Email is not designed for spam. Stop spamming. Problem solved.
Yes, you are right. And I know what you're thinking.
But please give me a chance to say this.
E
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 21:31 +0900, Byunghee HWANG (황병희) via mailop
wrote:
> Hellow Cyril,
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 11:06 +0100, Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
> > That's a good argument. I can do even better:
> >
> > Email is not designed for spam. Stop sp
Ken Peng via mailop writes:
> Hello,
>
> Why some huge ISPs do not even have SPF for their sending domains?
> such as att.net and t-online.de.
> I know they may let their users to send email from home DSL via (no-auth)
> relay servers, but since the IPs (no matter relay server or home IP) are
> a
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop writes:
> Dnia 26.05.2023 o godz. 13:16:39 Scott Mutter via mailop pisze:
>> If you ask me - a better solution would be to do away with forwarding
>> completely and incorporate POP checks, like Gmail does. This alleviates
>> all of the issues with forwarding mail in rela
12 matches
Mail list logo
