If it were me, I'd probably investigate Kumo MTA, it's open source,
good for bulk senders, and the peeps behind it are known members of
the email community/M3/etc. https://kumomta.com/
Dunno if it'll do everything you need, but it immediately clicked for
me as sounding the closest to what you migh
We are seeing an uptick in our email from the Wikimedia Foundation being
marked as spam by Microsoft. If someone from Microsoft would be able to
provide me some insight as to why, that would be much appreciated.
Alternatively, if someone has a Microsoft contact they could share that
would also be h
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 01:21:44PM -0400, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> We particularly want good logging so when someone asks why didn't I
> get my update we can tell them without grepping
> through a whole day's logs.
For timely delivery status info, I'd recommend enabling VERP and having
the
He's all set, handled off-list.
- Mark Alley
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, 6:54 PM joemailop--- via mailop
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I was wondering if anyone from ProofPoint might be around to assist with
> deliverability issues for emails coming from my [redacted] domain going to
> more than a few Proof
On 4/4/25 17:48, Tom Bartel via mailop wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for this thoughtful response - it is good feedback and we'll take
it to the team here to discuss.
If anyone else has similar input on cut line for a non-commercial usage,
we'd love the input.
Queries to the certified list should
Am 07.04.2025 um 13:21:44 Uhr schrieb John Levine via mailop:
> It's currently running through an old sendmail server but surely we
> can do better than that.
What is bad with that?
> What should I use? We particularly want good logging so when someone
> asks why didn't I get my update we can te
Sending it here, since postmas...@mimecast.com does not accept mail from
me; I'm not on the allowed-list. I hope someone from Mimecast can look
at this, or forward it to the correct place.
Do not hesitate to contact me directly if you need more info.
First, thank you for changing to send gzipped
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
With this Lets-Encrypt-stuff comes that the certificate needs to be
replaced every 3 Months. I do not have all the time to replace them that
often.
FYI, it seems likely that all certificate issuers will change to short
intervals as well, gradually down
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 12:47:33PM -0400, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> On 2025-04-07 at 09:38:56 UTC-0400 (Mon, 7 Apr 2025 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT))
> Mark Milhollan via mailop
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Mainly it is for browsers but that would force some senders to go along
> > if their recei
Hi Andy,
On Thursday, April 10, 2025 07:05 AEST, Andy Smith via mailop
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 11:29:58AM +1000, Simon Wilson via mailop wrote:
> as there was discussion back in November about Validity's usefulness
> on this list am posting it here too.
What bothers me more than
Hello friends,
I'm looking for anyone who may have some logs connecting to just one of our
servers that would be willing to share them.
Specifically:
V-ICO-PPMX1.senate.gov
Samples between
Between 07:30 and 09:30 EDT
As well as
Between 10:00 and 13:30 EDT
Feel free to connect off list.
Thanks,
On Mon 07/Apr/2025 21:28:24 +0200 Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
But if I*would* check
SPF, and I would notice a large number of SPF failures for some domain which
would seem to be legitimate mail, I would just either ignore "-all" or
ignore SPF completely for that domain.
Read Appendix D of RFC 7208.
Hi,
Am Mo den 7. Apr 2025 um 11:02 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop:
[Automatisation of short term SSL-Cert replacement]
I am aware of scripts and tools to renew the certificates. But I refuse
to let such tools change some security stuff like certificates. Letting
them do that stuff I could like
13 matches
Mail list logo
