On 28.08.2024 at 14:50 Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote:
>>> I'm wondering what SpamAssassin rule to boost, but it seems like this
>>> operator has mostly covered their bases? KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ might be worth
>>> boosting.
>>
>> We have seen an increase of spam and phishing emails from Google
>>
On 28.08.2024 at 16:18 Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
> On 28.08.24 07:46, Robert Giles via mailop wrote:
>> So dropping Google Groups entirely: since Google's infrastructure is
>> "unblockable", I'd suspect keying on a Google Groups-specific header,
>> but how are you (and other folks)
On 28.08.2024 at 21:31 Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am 27.08.2024 um 12:56:18 Uhr schrieb Eduardo Diaz Comellas via mailop:
>> I think that sending the vacation messages with null sender is an
>> standard practise and the best way to avoid loops. I've found no
>> problems with any other email p
Hi All,
I run groups.io, an email groups hosting service, similar to Google Groups.
Over the past couple of years, we've had several instances of the following
behavior:
- Someone controlling several Yahoo/Hotmail/Gmail accounts will sign them
up to mailing lists. Each address will sign up for 1-
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:06 PM Michael Rathbun via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 11:51:24 -0700, Brandon Long via mailop
> wrote:
>
> >Typically, the phone number use in cases like this is part of trying to
> >prevent bulk operations.
>
> All I can personally say is t
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Mark Fletcher via mailop wrote:
> Hi All,
> Over the past couple of years, we've had several instances of the following
> behavior:
>
> - Someone controlling several Yahoo/Hotmail/Gmail accounts will sign them
> up to mailing lists. Each address will sign
According to Viktor Dukhovni via mailop :
>> - Months later, they will forward the messages they've received from these
>> lists, unmodified, to many (seemingly) random people, all at once
>
>How often can you reasonably rotate your DKIM signing keys (really
>mint a new selector and key)?
Good tho
Mark,
I don't think I've seen this behavior but I'll have to watch out for it.
Overall, I would oposit that they are sending legitimate traffic to mask
other bad emails at the same time in an attempt to change the signal to
noise ratios and/or to raise their domain/IP/system reputation.
And
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:29:12 -0700, Brandon Long via mailop
wrote:
>> "Don't be evil", indeed. Missed that one by a mile.
>>
>
>The banality of evil or something, but trying to protect your personal
>information is generally considered
>a good idea and enforced legally around the world. What is
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:03:01PM -0700, Brandon Long wrote:
> > Welcome to two-factor denial of service. I try to resist signing up for
> > such baked-in disasters as much as I can, but the powers that be (hello
> > GitHub) have made it impossible in many cases.
> >
> > It is a sad state of aff
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 04:02:49PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail via mailop wrote:
> And reading some of the other responses, because the emails are being
> forwarded, I'm assuming that DKIM wouldn't pass [...]
The most signficant benefit of DKIM message content authentication over
SPF is precisely tha
11 matches
Mail list logo
