[mailop] [ADMIN] Re: AT&T Block

2024-07-06 Thread Graeme Fowler via mailop
On 5 July 2024 23:23:08 Jeff Pang via mailop wrote: No. TNL(t-online) is even worse. BTW, you may contact Lili directly who is on this list. Please don't do this again. It's one thing for a representative of an organisation to invite contact off list; it's something else entirely for a third

Re: [mailop] envelope or header address?

2024-07-06 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Fri 05/Jul/2024 23:21:17 +0200 Jeff Pang via mailop wrote: OT question, can return-path be customized by sender MTA/MUA? Or must it be envelope? Return-path, envelop sender, bounce address and MAIL FROM are all synonyms for the same thing. Mailing lists always change it when they forwa

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: AT&T Block

2024-07-06 Thread Marcel Becker via mailop
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 15:26 Jeff Pang via mailop wrote: > > BTW, you may contact Lili directly who is on this list. ATT runs their own inbound servers. Lili is not ATT. Please always use official support channels first. ___ mailop mailing list mailop

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: AT&T Block

2024-07-06 Thread Scott Mutter via mailop
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 10:26 AM Marcel Becker via mailop wrote: > > ATT runs their own inbound servers. Lili is not ATT. Please always use > official support channels first. > > That's kind of the issue. Nobody responds when you write abuse_...@abuse-att.net Why is that address included in the