I have replied to messages from them numerous times of the years looking to get
additional details on a supposed issue (always the same IP).
I never received a single reply back, eventually I gave up.
Cheers,
Tom
[Mapp]
Tom Ellengold
Sr Compliance & Privacy Consultant
(o) 619-342-4346
(m) 718
On 2019-01-24 09:29, Paul Ebersman wrote:
And if the
server doesn't give the same complete answer every time (regardless of
order), it's technically violating the DNS RFCs.
I'm not sure that this is really true from a client's standpoint.
Just because you get a different answer from my authori
ebersman> And if the server doesn't give the same complete answer every
ebersman> time (regardless of order), it's technically violating the DNS
ebersman> RFCs.
dw> I'm not sure that this is really true from a client's standpoint.
dw> Just because you get a different answer from my authoritative
On 2019-01-26 16:24, Paul Ebersman wrote:
ebersman> And if the server doesn't give the same complete answer every
ebersman> time (regardless of order), it's technically violating the DNS
ebersman> RFCs.
dw> I'm not sure that this is really true from a client's standpoint.
dw> Just because you g
dw> Assume I incremented the SOA so many times it wrapped around and is
dw> back to the original number (because you can't prove it didn't,
dw> therefore your code can't make assumptions about the SOA even if you
dw> happen to have it available).
There are all sorts of ways to abuse and break DNS.
In article <20190126232417.87671fb7...@fafnir.remote.dragon.net>,
>dw> Just because you get a different answer from my authoritative server
>dw> every time you query doesn't actually mean I am giving you
>dw> incomplete answers, maybe I'm just changing the zone very very
>dw> frequently?
>
>Yes, if
