> Isn't the simplest way to handle this is to treat IPv6 at the /64 or smaller
> level?
There is no broad consensus yet on where IPv6 reputation should be attached to.
Cheap hosting providers handing out individual /128s to customers…
Discovery protocols to find the „right“ prefix length to q
> If the industry had moved to a reputation model, it would be easier to
> discuss "how bad is it" and whether it's bad enough to block at IP time, or
> whether you mix it into your spam score.
Isn’t this what postscreen_dnsbl_sites is doing, for example?
> Will SMTP be the last hold-out on IP
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Rob McEwen wrote:
Here is an article I posted on Linkedin about spam filtering IPv6-sent
email.
"Should mail servers publish IPv6 MX records? Could this harm your spam
filtering?"
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-mail-servers-publish-ipv6-mx-records-rob-mcewen/
Th
On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 at 17:36, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> I'm curious.
> If a domain has no MX record, do all servers deliver to an record,
> as required by (at least) RFC3974,
required?
"This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of an
Is it expected that it is possible for the Internet at large to send
email to t-mobile.com addresses?
It looks like they have some far-ranging network blocks for some
reason, at the TCP/IP level (connection attempts time out).
I haven't seen any public unblocking instructions, and the usual
unblo
On 10/06/2018 3:16 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 at 17:36, Andrew C Aitchison
> wrote:
>> I'm curious.
>> If a domain has no MX record, do all servers deliver to an record,
>> as required by (at least) RFC3974,
You'd expect, No MX record, no mail delivery. MX is related
