[mailop] SCL missing in MSFT headers?

2018-04-20 Thread Jenny Nespola
Hi All! I may have missed an announcement or thread, but is anyone else noticing the SCL score missing in MSFT headers? Thanks! Jen ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] SCL missing in MSFT headers?

2018-04-20 Thread Kent McGovern
They must have, I just see PCL and BCL. Kent On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Jenny Nespola wrote: > Hi All! > > I may have missed an announcement or thread, but is anyone else noticing > the SCL score missing in MSFT headers? > > Thanks! > Jen > > _

Re: [mailop] SCL missing in MSFT headers?

2018-04-20 Thread Michael Wise via mailop
Can you share some sample headers? 😊 Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? From: mailop On Behalf Of Jenny Nespola Sent: F

Re: [mailop] SCL missing in MSFT headers?

2018-04-20 Thread Jenny Nespola
Sure thing! I'll send you my most recent one now :) On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Michael Wise wrote: > > > Can you share some sample headers? 😊 > > > > Aloha, > > Michael. > > -- > > *Michael J Wise* > Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis > > "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." > > Got

[mailop] Heads-up: next Exim, TLS for smarthosts

2018-04-20 Thread Phil Pennock
Folks, mail-providers especially, a heads-up: I've committed a change for the next release of Exim (not imminent) which is a "default configuration file" change to the suggested configuration for talking to mail smarthosts. The changes are all around TLS. The new Exim suggested smarthost configu

Re: [mailop] SCL missing in MSFT headers?

2018-04-20 Thread Christina Hoheisel via mailop
issed an announcement or thread, but is anyone else noticing > the SCL score missing in MSFT headers? > > Thanks! > Jen > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/mailop/attachments/20180

Re: [mailop] Received header address information

2018-04-20 Thread Dave Warren
On 2018-04-18 17:49, Al Iverson wrote: In the past I've had to deal with DNSBL listings based on faked received headers-- IMHO, it's not safe to parse IPs beyond connections that you yourself have verified. I've always considered this a feature, not a bug. Spammer forges their way into getting