On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article
> you
> write:
>>See RFC 2142: "3. BUSINESS-RELATED MAILBOX NAMES
>>
>> These names are related to an organization's line-of-business
>> activities." …
>>
>>"SUPPORTCustomer ServiceProblems with product or service"
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 11:14 +1100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> One can only conclude, they either have a leak in their API, or they
>> altered the permissions to give out emails when specifically denied, or
>> they got hacked and
Pretty sure we're already on son of RFC ignorant because their testing
program uses non-rfc5321 compliant messages for testing.
*shrug*
Postmaster does get about 10 messages a day from a single person
complaining that our abuse address actually has av and spam protection on
and rejects his messag
On 2018-01-21 09:40, Charles McKean wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
wrote:
On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 11:14 +1100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
One can only conclude, they either have a leak in their API, or they
altered the permissions to give out emails when specific
