[mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Alexander Burch
What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? Does anyone find it impactful for delivery? They offered to let us join without any vetting, just sent us a bill for $___ without any questions. If there is no vetting process I have a hard time seeing how it would validate any sender a

[mailop] Message recipients column in SNDS

2017-11-01 Thread Maarten Oelering
Hi, We have been tracking the numbers on SNDS for a few years. One of the metrics we monitor is the difference between “RCPT commands” and “Message recipients”. See also the section “Message Recipients” on the SNDS FAQ page: "This is the number of recipients on messages actually transmitted by

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Bill Cole
On 1 Nov 2017, at 9:28 (-0400), Alexander Burch wrote: What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? Never heard of them before today... They appear to be mostly oriented to the German and Deutschophone European markets. (Note that I've run mail systems for German entities'

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Laura Atkins
They’re useful / important if you’re mailing into certain EU-centric consumer email providers - .de being the big one. But if your market is primarily US or webmail providers it’s not a huge priority. laura > On Nov 1, 2017, at 6:28 AM, Alexander Burch wrote: > > What is the general opinion

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Steve Atkins
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 6:28 AM, Alexander Burch wrote: > > What is the general opinion of the Certified Senders Alliance? Does anyone > find it impactful for delivery? They offered to let us join without any > vetting, just sent us a bill for $___ without any questions. If there is no > vetting

[mailop] About the Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread Alexander Zeh
Hello everyone, a friend informed me about a topic going on about the Certified Senders Alliance on this mailing list. That’s why I joined it. I work for the CSA for many years now. First and foremost of all: It is definitely not true that a sender can join the CSA without any vetting. That st

Re: [mailop] Certified Senders Alliance

2017-11-01 Thread David Hofstee
The rules they offer are "normal" for an ESP. I have complained personally, a couple of times (to the address they make you add in the headers). Did not get any response on that (repeatedly). Microsoft and Yahoo are partners of the CSA. Terry posted something on it but I can't remember what they d

Re: [mailop] Earthlink Unblock Requests

2017-11-01 Thread Staudinger, Malcolm
Sorry I missed this - am getting less and less involved in ELNK consumer mail abuse/delivery these days. We recently found an issue that was causing outbound replies from some of our abuse automation to end up on the floor, and it's corrected now, so give it another shot, and please feel free t

Re: [mailop] Hotmail and 4.5.1 4.7.500 Server Busy with some

2017-11-01 Thread Emre Üst |euro . message|
Hello Michael, We have same issues 185.11.213.11;185.11.213.12;185.11.213.13;185.11.213.14;185.11.213.15 İts kind of like all network blocked . Thank you -- *EMRE ÜST* Deliverability Specialist *t.* +902123430739 *f.* +902123430742 *email: *emre@euromsg.com <%23> *skype:* user_name

[mailop] Sort of old but Apple now accepts TLS1.2 on IMAP...

2017-11-01 Thread Eric Tykwinski
I just saw on Full Disclosure about Apple patching a bunch of services for disabling TLS1.0, so I figured I’d give Apple Mail a shot. I can confirm that Apple Mail Version 11.1 (3445.4.7) does in fact use TLS1.2 now, but of course you’re always going to have older clients hitting your servers un