On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 04:22:55PM -0700, Michael wrote:
> You might be going too stringent in that case..
I don't think so. This would allow fred.amazon@ and things that meet
those kinds of use cases, while disallowing amazon@ and amazon.com@.
Note that I don't particularly like this -- years ag
> Il 26 luglio 2017 alle 19.10 Brandon Long ha scritto:
>
> Why can't smtp software being expected to maintain a list of trusted CAs?
> Or at least run on an OS that is expected to do so.
>
There is a standard explanation (literally) in RFC 7672, section 1.3, and
especially 1.3.4.:
"Ev
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 09:05, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>
>> Il 26 luglio 2017 alle 19.10 Brandon Long ha scritto:>>
>> Why can't smtp software being expected to maintain a list of trusted CAs?
>> Or at least run on an OS that is expected to do so.> There is a standard
>> explanation (liter
On 07/27/2017 11:44 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
I've never understood why this is a special challenge in the SMTP world,
it's generally a solved problem for HTTPS, XMPP, and various other
protocols.
It's my understanding that the problem has to do with the (lack of)
people involved in the transact
On 2017-07-25 at 22:10 -0400, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> Sorry, probably straying from the topic, but does anyone know any good SMTP
> tests for DANE.
> I’m using https://dane.sys4.de/ currently and it works, but I would like
> something with some more details if possible.
Self-pimping:
https://
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> On 07/27/2017 11:44 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
>
>> I've never understood why this is a special challenge in the SMTP world,
>> it's generally a solved problem for HTTPS, XMPP, and various other
>> protocols.
>>
>
> It's my understand
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Vittorio Bertola <
vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
> Il 26 luglio 2017 alle 19.10 Brandon Long ha scritto:
>
> Why can't smtp software being expected to maintain a list of trusted CAs?
> Or at least run on an OS that is expected to do so.
>
> There is