they probably sell fax machines.
-K
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Brandon Long via mailop
wrote:
> That's a custom rejection message set by that GSuite customer, no clue
> what policy they set.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Mar 15, 2017 9:35 PM, "Seth Mattinen" wrote:
>
>> Here's one I'm hoping someon
On 16/03/2017 14:18, Kevin Huxham wrote:
they probably sell fax machines.
Their response is a bit like someone sending them credit card details on
a postcard, and them tearing it up (because you shouldn't send
confidential information on postcards) and asking the sender to send the
details a
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:18 -0400, Kevin Huxham wrote:
> they probably sell fax machines.
Reminds me of a case many years ago when a client who ran courses on data
protection emailed (yes, emailed) all their credit card details to the
billing dept. because they weren't near a browser to pay online
So, yes, requiring TLS after the message was already sent in plaintext is
less perfect than the alternative, it does have the benefit of informing
and usually getting things fixed.
Ie, if you assume that it corrects future failures, than its still useful.
It's also a fallback, you can enforce cer
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 07:37, Paul Smith wrote:
> On 16/03/2017 14:18, Kevin Huxham wrote:
>> they probably sell fax machines.
>
> Their response is a bit like someone sending them credit card details
> on a postcard, and them tearing it up (because you shouldn't send
> confidential informa
