Re: [mailop] New comment - [#503261] Re: Microsoft holding IPs hostage?

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Robert Hong wrote: > > Our sincere apologies. We've unsubscribed from the list with the address > which is connected to our ticketing system while we investigate the matter. > I suspect an update has been made recently by our supplier... I can't be alone in wonder

[mailop] Contact at Mailchimp?

Anyone from Mailchimp on-list? support@mailchimp now auto-returns an ignore-bot with a link that points to a webpage with no useful options. Why are people in the email business so difficult to reach by email? -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Interne

Re: [mailop] Contact at Mailchimp?

Hi Jay, Happy to help. I work on the delivery team at MailChimp. Feel free to email me offlist if you’d prefer. joeyrutle...@gmail.com Joey Rutledge > On Jun 8, 2016, at 7:25 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: > > Anyone from Mailchimp on-list? support@mailchimp now auto-returns an > ignore-bot with

[mailop] Quick practical question on DMARC.

So I’ve seen on here, people seem to be pushing for DMARC, but honestly what is the difference between DMARC and just using DKIM for end users. IMHO, if the message is signed with DKIM, sending reports for DMARC matters little besides knowing that someone is spamming with your domain. I’m sure

Re: [mailop] Quick practical question on DMARC.

You get reports of who out there is misusing your domain name, or if you’re misconfigured. DMARC is a way of telling others who to complain to if the authentication mechanism breaks, or exactly what you want done if the message doesn’t pass the various checks. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise

Re: [mailop] Quick practical question on DMARC.

>I understand the idea of sending DMARC reports sounds great, but I don’t think >any of our business servers >support it as of yet, but I’ll definitely be asking vendors... I have 92,000 aggregate reports and 55,000 failure reports that I've gotten since 2012. If you're not a large provider, sen

[mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

Hi, a user of my server complained, that some of his mails don't reach mail accounts from hotmail/live/outlook etc. that complaint is nothing new, the problem exists for months now. the users mails are dkim signed, the domain has DKIM and SPF TXT DNS records, since yesterday there is also a DMARC

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

At the request of the customer-base, traffic that is classified as sufficiently spammy (by various "Black Box" algorithms that I have no knowledge of the inner workings...) is deleted even after a successful delivery. At one point, Hotmail tried to turn off the delete action for sufficiently s

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

Hi, thanks for your fast and detailed reply! i will follow your suggestion regarding tackling the system by marking a sender as safe, so it might reconsider its decisions. as a side note: at least here in germany, discarding mail without any notification of the sender or recipient is called supr

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

I shall forward that info along, thanks. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -Original Message- From: Andreas Ziegler [mailto:m...@andreas-ziegler.de] Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/Hotmail discards mails

As a long time hotmail.com account holder, I can tell you that I would never request a silent-discard option. If you are able to determine via black-box algorithms that a message is sufficiently spammy, why not refuse after post-dot? I'm sure Hotmail deals with spam volumes that are orders of